Quote:
Originally Posted by osho1226
Why do you think the line is so great? Had it been a 'real' game, the spread would have been the exact opposite. You have no idea what the Pats will do in terms of resting their starters. This is just like the Jets-Indy game last week. If they pull their starters and don't come to play, you are left holding a bad bet. Unless you can get into Bill Bellichek's head, stay away from this game! Please don't tell me that Patriots always play to win - they did that when they were going for the perfect season. Seeding between 3 & 4 isn't really that big of a deal as the line maker is acknowledging with this line. Then again, the Pats may actually think it is important. Too many variables in this one and no discernible advantage. Gun to my head, I would pick Houston under the assumption that they will give it their all against New England's second stringers.
|
I'm not saying you're wrong in what you say. Vegas does know however, especially in Week 17, that the 'public' will almost ALWAYS bet into a playoff scenario: "The Jets NEED to win to get in", etc. What a team NEEDS vs. what actually OCCURS on the field are seldomly the same thing. IMO, that's how this line went from HOU -7 to -8 in the first place.
Another example is WASH/SD. Using Bookmaker as an example, the line opened @ SD -8. Here came all the Redskin money. In a span of 3.5 hours, it was down to SD -3.....why? It may very well be a dress rehearsal for the Chargers on Sunday, but what is Washington's motivation? They just took two drubbings at home to division opponents, are out of the playoff picture and know the coaching staff won't be there next season. I'm not on this game, but the Chargers depth alone should carry them through if starters get rested. The line is now SD -4.
I could easily be wrong after this game plays out, but I think NE + 7 is a gift. If Houston does win, I'm thinking 24-21 or 24-20.
