[gshock1]

Just saw Coughlin on TV describing the field as muddy, soft and sandy. This does NOT bode well for us overs. Thinking about hedging my bet and going the other direction and just pay the losing spread. What do you guys think?

[2daBank]

i looking at the field now doesnt look that bad plus when the surface is slick imo it favors the wrs much more than the defenses

[DOMINATER]

Good Idea I do it sometimes the juice is better than losing, if its40 times .Ill double it then subtract 40 not a bad move ,in fact its a grear move I am going under and taking wash. The Giants are playind bad there washed up good luck

[Serbone]

But it is hard to get to the passers with footing like that... sometimes good "D"s can get to the QB on artificial turf. Skins and Giants both capable of getting to the passer a lot... but now they will struggle. Helps the "over". Unless it is windy 15 mph or more really hurts... greater than 10 is an issue, but not not as bad.

[2daBank]

But it is hard to get to the passers with footing like that... sometimes good "D"s can get to the QB on artificial turf. Skins and Giants both capable of getting to the passer a lot... but now they will struggle. Helps the "over". Unless it is windy 15 mph or more really hurts... greater than 10 is an issue, but not not as bad.

dont think it is to windy. i got two 3 team parleys tied into this over and im not hedging shit this game is going over(i hope). great point about the pass rushers