[stats13]

i mean this bet is so sucka isn't it

[stats13]

srsly guys how shaky is this line? the colts d is solid this year and manning is no loser on national tv

[stats13]

well i dont think the fish break 14 but what teh **** do i know

[Sharkl11]

I am going Dolphins +3. Colts had trouble with the Jags last week. Dolphins will bring their A game.

[Mybologne]

colts giving -3 1/2 is fishy

[Vesuvius]

on the sucker bet with Colts -3.5 (+105)

[oda11]

I am on Miami tomorrow...

[Limey]

For what it's worth (I've just gone 3-6 on Sunday after all, ha ha) I quite like the Colts here and may play them. Miami are ripe for opposing all season, and the Colts handled Jacksonville better than the score suggests... granted, Jacksonville are showing signs of being a major disappointment again.

[danrman]

colts win 24-14

[AlphaOmega]

DO NOT sleep on Miami . . . the colts are under a new coaching staff that has yet to get in rythem yet . . . Manning has always dominated the Dolphins but something has to be up if the line is at -3 for the colts . . . All in all the play should be MIAMI +3 . . . watch the line go to 2 or 2.5 right before kick off . . .

[slacker00]

Yeah, I'm staying away from this one. Something's fishy. Maybe it's the big tuna I'm smelling.

[NardVa]

The Dolphins actually played some pretty good defense against the Falcons. The score was 19-7, but the Falcons only put togeather 2 drives that got them 10 points while the other 9 came from a touchdown (missed PAT) and a field goal off Dolphin turnovers which gave the Falcons a short filed to work with. I can see the Dolphins defense keeping the Indy offense in check but the question is what is Miami going to do on offense. The Colts defense looked good against the Jags but that isn't saying much. I can see the Dolphins winning straight up but it's hard to go against the Colts due to the fact it's normal for them to start the season off anywhere from 7-0 or better. (Not counting last year)

[Robust]

on the sucker bet with Colts -3.5 (+105)

just as long as you realize it's a sucker bet.. the correct side is miami..

good luck!!

Robust

[Mr Winters]

I agree with Robust here, especially with a fresh mind today. Yeah, this looks like a sucker bet big-time, how can Indy only be favored by "only" 3? Maybe because they actually have a good chance at losing? Me thinks the Indy-backers are the ones being trapped. . . just my thought.

[sportscash]

im still going with the colts .maybe the under also.

[coachr1]

I like Miami +3.

[aman86]

looks like best bet is miami, we saw steelers and pats lose, so just because it's indy doesn't mean they'll win/cover

[waco66]

on the sucker bet with Colts -3.5

sucking right along...woot woot

[ASH0479]

My book is showing Colts -3 (-125)

Interesting juice, yesterday the following~

Giants +3(-125)
Cards +3 (-125)
Bears +3 (-125)

All those covered and actually won outirght.

[Mr Winters]

Good observation ASH. . . I'm gonna lay it on the fish tonight. If they win, I'm gonna call it a GREAT observation.

[G's pks]

I like Colts...but home dogs on Monday night always tough!

[Wrigley]

like dolphins +3

[ASH0479]

Dolphins +3 (EV) at my books, Colts -3 (-125) now...

[ASH0479]

Good observation ASH. . . I'm gonna lay it on the fish tonight. If they win, I'm gonna call it a GREAT observation.

If you follow the trend you would take the Colts, they are -3 (-125)

[Dakine]

Miami +3 and the Over 42 ....

[stats13]

how shaky is it that it hasn't gone to -3.5 yet? this has upset written all over it

[Hybris]

Yep buying Miami +3.5 i think, or maybe wait and se if it get there...

[Italia_NYC]

P. Manning vs. Pennington....? Hmmm......tough one.

[LT Profits]

UNDER may the only play here

[stats13]

is it raining in miami? its ****in pouring in atlanta

nope

http://miami.justweather.com/

[Mr Winters]

If you follow the trend you would take the Colts, they are -3 (-125)

huh?

The dogs won. . . right? What did I miss?

[RICHIE801]

Miami +3 and under 41.

[cs11787]

huh?

The dogs won. . . right? What did I miss?

He wasnt talkin about the dogs. He was talkin about all the teams that were (-125) that covered.