[Justin7]

Eagles -15 parlayed with UNDER 40.

It sounds anti-correlated.

Riddle me this, batman. How does this parlay do for all games where spread >=14, and total <=42 for the last 10 years?

[Dark Horse]

Probably very good (very uneven teams, no need to run up score, plenty of running out of clock).

What about 2H under in this situation?

[AC1318]

I originally came up with these exact two plays, but could not take it.

I need to start passing on games like tonight vs. betting everything all the time, self control or go broke.

[Rio DiNero]

I like it, I have the game 31-6, my book wouldn't take it. They won't take any parlays if the game is correlated, even the uncorrelated ones.

[AC1318]

I like it, I have the game 31-6, my book wouldn't take it. They won't take any parlays if the game is correlated, even the uncorrelated ones.

thats BS change books

I know you can't choose alternate lines with totals by most books but thats it.

[Rio DiNero]

I like it, I have the game 31-6, my book wouldn't take it. They won't take any parlays if the game is correlated, even the uncorrelated ones.

I almost called it right on the dot. Glad couldn't get that parlay down.

[guru-t]

Actually the play IMO made alot of sense due to the Browns not scoring a TD in three games and as I said earlier the only thing that worried me about the play is possible defensive TDs.And sure enough.Still cashed,but that Fat Ass Reid letting Kolb throw the ball on 2nd and 5 with a 30-3 lead is a head scratcher.Also,Dorsey vs Jim Johnsons defense?The play was the Eagles and the under.Reid Fukked that up.