[ClayBalls]

I'm kind of new at his and have lost some money going with what the general public thinks which usually matches with what I think.
So tell me if I may be on the right track:

From http://twominutewarning.com/bettracker.htm

Jacksonville with only 15% of bets but no line movement
Oakland with only 13% but no line movement
Minnesota with only 16% but no movement
Cleveland with 30% with no movement

Every one of these teams I would instinctively bet against, but maybe that is why I always end up pissed. Are these solid plays for this reason alone???

[bostonbruins]

Are these solid plays for this reason alone???

Of course not

[ClayBalls]

OK. Serious question though. Been reading about smart money and RLM. Could use a thought out response.

[ClayBalls]

Yeah...thanks.

[ClayBalls]

When I looked at that, it could be taken as sarcastic, but I really mean thanks!

[Robust]

I'm kind of new at his and have lost some money going with what the general public thinks which usually matches with what I think.
So tell me if I may be on the right track:

From http://twominutewarning.com/bettracker.htm

Jacksonville with only 15% of bets but no line movement
Oakland with only 13% but no line movement
Minnesota with only 16% but no movement
Cleveland with 30% with no movement

Every one of these teams I would instinctively bet against, but maybe that is why I always end up pissed. Are these solid plays for this reason alone???

yes! all of those can be converted into good plays.. just adjust the numbers to your liking (buying points).

Examples:
Jax 1.5->7.5 (6pt tease)
Oak +7.5->9.5 (buy 1/2 pt to 2.5pts)
Min +3.5 (buy 1/2 pt)
Cle +14.5 (buy 1/2 pt)

These are the numbers sharps were looking at according to Nick Bogdanovich's article ("what the sharps are thinking...")

good luck!

Robust

[danrman]

i've liked jax and oak all week.. tough bets to make but winning bets usually are.. for instance i took atlanta sat. night.. now who liked that