View New Posts
12
  1. #1

    Default Brandon Lang Picks..

    Where and when do you find them? That fvcker takes one of my picks next time I am all in on the opposite. I got his website but its just a pay to see bullcrap..which is dumb UNLESS you know he is an automatic fade and you pay for his picks just to see what you should bet!! Hmm

  2. #2

    Default

    Service Plays forum....he usually releases around Noon EST on weekdays and 9 AM on weekends.

    brandon lang .com reveals his dime amounts....the higher the dime amount, the worse his plays tend to be.

  3. #3

    Default

    There is a legion of us who fade this guy every day.....you assign a dollar amount you want to play per dime based on your bankroll. For me, I play $1 per dime. 10 dime play = $10. 100 dime play = $100......and so on...

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lite1up View Post
    There is a legion of us who fade this guy every day.....you assign a dollar amount you want to play per dime based on your bankroll. For me, I play $1 per dime. 10 dime play = $10. 100 dime play = $100......and so on...
    Have you kept track of his record? How much are you up fading him?

  5. #5

    Default

    I'm pretty sure he's down close to 400 "dimes" this month alone. UziSuicide keeps better track of the actual results than I do.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dvb02 View Post
    Have you kept track of his record? How much are you up fading him?

    I just started auto-fading him every day this past week...

    Lang is 6-18-1 on the year (-485.5 Dimes).

    He finished 2011 at -3020 dimes, 2009 and 2010 were very similar with losses of around 3,000 dimes each.

    Since i started fading him, he is 1-7 (0-3 college hoops, 1-4 NFL). I'm already up about $75 and he's been primarily fukking around with small dime plays. He's 1-1 on his biggest releases since I've been fading (75 dime NFL playoff releases).

    It's a grind with this guy but his fade track record is more proven than any successful handicapper I can think of.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dvb02 View Post
    Have you kept track of his record? How much are you up fading him?
    Lang proclaimed that December would be a December to remember for his paying customers. He then lost 1,300 dimes just that month.

  8. #8

    Default

    not to mention one of his NFL plays was a teaser (Packers -1.5 and over). Fade nation doesn't normally fade his teasers, I went very small on the fade (Giants +15 and Under 60) and won. I know it's not part of the rules of fade but I think I'll start fading his teasers at $1/dime as well.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by postal warrior View Post
    Lang proclaimed that December would be a December to remember for his paying customers. He then lost 1,300 dimes just that month.
    Yep. If I started fading December 1st I would be up over $1,000 only betting $1/Dime.

  10. #10

    Default

    I just started paying attention to his picks, especially last night with Kentucky on an aweful run not covering the spread and being 17 point favorites, he picks Arkansas and Kentucky covers, I'm officially a believer might have to start fading.

  11. #11

    Default

    Lang is on Missouri State tonight..F'ing all n on Creighton tonight boys!!!

  12. #12

    Default

    Can't believe they made a movie about this square.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dotheopposite View Post
    Lang is on Missouri State tonight..F'ing all n on Creighton tonight boys!!!
    NO!

    You only fade the PAID PLAYS

    His Paid Play is Wichita State -2 so Fade Nation is on Northern Iowa.....

    We don't fade his comp plays or teasers.

  14. #14

    Default

    I'm fading both. Creighton was already a play today anyways..I don't think they get swept by Missouri St just because I believe they are the better team. Lang just made me feel so much better about my pick

  15. #15

  16. #16

    Default

    Theoretically one should hit around 50/50 just picking games by flipping coins right? I mean, not exactly 50/50, but within a reasonable range. For this dude to actually put in the effort to try and pick winners and end up picking losers like 70-80% of the time is really quite remarkable.

  17. #17

    Default

    Its funny because there are threads on sports betting sites all across the country that fade him, this is actually a national phenomena. I can only imagine that the only people that pay for his picks are people that are going to fade. For his livelihood he probably should keep picking losers.

  18. #18

    Default

    Lang cannot pick losers, please understand what is happening here. Lang tries to pick winners but because he picks one game typically that advice or pick is a loser most of the time. You are correct when saying that it's hard to pick say 60% losers or winners, but once he must decide on a game that day it is wrong. If he picked every game on the board he would around 50/50. When the chips are down losers end up finding the loser. That is it in a nutshell. Last nights Arkansas pick proves exactly what I am explaining here.

  19. #19

    Default

    @thebestthereis: Dude, I've seen you on like 15 threads defending this Lang hack. He obviously sucks, and you are either him or you know him personally and are trying to defend his sh!tty plays. Just stop. His track record speaks volumes for itself.

  20. #20

  21. #21

    Default

    I'm usually not one to fade blindly, any more than follow blindly, but, as far as I can tell, this this guy just happens to have the perfect psychological makeup and betting strategies to make him a gem, and we are lucky that he is enough of a self-promoter to make himself so visible. It's crazy. I'm on Creighton.

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by caseyman011 View Post
    @thebestthereis: Dude, I've seen you on like 15 threads defending this Lang hack. He obviously sucks, and you are either him or you know him personally and are trying to defend his sh!tty plays. Just stop. His track record speaks volumes for itself.
    Yes I am defending Lang

    You must not read English.

  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by caseyman011 View Post
    @thebestthereis: Dude, I've seen you on like 15 threads defending this Lang hack. He obviously sucks, and you are either him or you know him personally and are trying to defend his sh!tty plays. Just stop. His track record speaks volumes for itself.
    Did i read this wrong? Is he saying that you're defending Lang?

  24. #24

    Default

    Another guy with a documented track record of fail is "The Mighty Quinn" from the New York Daily News.

    He's not a tout but his picks are just about equally horrible....you fade him by flat-betting the opposite side (as opposed to Lang where you fade based on his dime amounts).

    Quinn is on Toledo tonight so the play is Northern Illinois +8.5.

  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lite1up View Post
    Another guy with a documented track record of fail is "The Mighty Quinn" from the New York Daily News.

    He's not a tout but his picks are just about equally horrible....you fade him by flat-betting the opposite side (as opposed to Lang where you fade based on his dime amounts).

    Quinn is on Toledo tonight so the play is Northern Illinois +8.5.
    Quinn's gotta win one every once in awhile

  26. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malone View Post
    Quinn's gotta win one every once in awhile

    Yeah, but he's a documented 43% capper. So yeah, he'll win....won tonight with Toledo skull-fukking NIU...but the point is you fade him every day and you will make money.

  27. #27

    Default

    Of course I fade Lang last night with the N. Iowa pick and he gets it right....
    $5.00 $114.20 Loss 4 Team Parlay
    Win 1/18/12 7:00pm College Basketball 752 George Washington +110* vs Richmond
    Win 1/18/12 7:00pm College Basketball 754 Nebraska +140* vs Indiana U
    Loss 1/18/12 8:00pm College Basketball 796 Northern Iowa +120* vs Wichita State
    Win 1/18/12 7:35pm NHL Hockey 51 Washington Capitals +115* vs Montreal Canadiens

  28. #28

    Default

    I would have really been mad on this parlay if Rice would have won in OT

    $1.00 $306.47 Loss 11 Team Parlay
    Win 1/18/12 7:00pm College Basketball 746 Duquesne -220* vs Massachusetts
    Win 1/18/12 7:00pm College Basketball 754 Nebraska +140* vs Indiana U
    Win 1/18/12 7:00pm College Basketball 766 Villanova -117* vs Seton Hall
    Win 1/18/12 7:00pm College Basketball 779 Cincinnati +10 -250* vs Connecticut
    Loss 1/18/12 8:00pm College Basketball 788 Rice -190* vs UAB
    Loss 1/18/12 8:00pm College Basketball 796 Northern Iowa +120* vs Wichita State
    Win 1/18/12 9:00pm College Basketball 814 Kansas State -240* vs Texas
    Win 1/18/12 7:35pm NHL Hockey 51 Washington Capitals +115* vs Montreal Canadiens
    Win 1/18/12 7:35pm NHL Hockey 54 Chicago Blackhawks -1 -147* vs Buffalo Sabres
    Win 1/18/12 9:35pm NHL Hockey 56 Colorado Avalanche +1 -235* vs Florida Panthers
    Win 1/18/12 10:05pm NHL Hockey 58 Anaheim Ducks +1 -260* vs Phoenix Coyotes

  29. #29

    Default

    lang is that bad that you guys go against all his paid plays? lol thats great

  30. #30

  31. #31

  32. #32

  33. #33

  34. #34

  35. #35

12 Last
Top