I called Syracuse to win on the moneyline +380 vs Memphis on Dec 20. (Syracuse won)
The Memphis line should have been -200 and was -400 instead.
The Pittsburgh line is overpriced a bit, should be -300 but is -400.
Is this deja vu all over again?
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
-
01-19-09 05:35 PM #1
Is Syracuse/Pitt game just like Syracuse/Memphis game from Dec 20
-
01-19-09 05:38 PM #2
could be.... i like the cuse.... they just might pull it off.... bad thing is pitt coming off first loss....
-
01-19-09 05:41 PM #3
why do you think it should be -300?
Originally Posted by curious
-
01-19-09 05:45 PM #4
Using the pythag and log5 formulas and then converting the win probability to a money line, I get Pittsburgh -300. Actually -285. I got them earlier today at -400. Originally Posted by losturmarbles
Then I got to thinking about the Memphis game and looked back at my records. Almost the same stats except Memphis should have been -200 and was -400.
So now I am nervous. LOL
-
01-19-09 05:50 PM #5
i got -459 doing the same thing
Reply With Quote