[TheSchafe]

Haven't been here that long, but I haven't seen any discussion on this O/U so I'd like to contribute a little.

I really like the under here, pretty much due to past history: 8 of these teams' 9 most recent meetings have gone under totals like 192 and 181 (2007). I know a lot changes over the course of a year or two, but the more things change, the more things stay the same.

In short, this O/U line seems a few points too high than it should be, so I'm jumping all over it.

Thoughts?

[Leto]

I'm liking the under here too.

[don logan]

Betting the over 194 myself, line looks a shade low to me. Either way, GL bro.

[TheSchafe]

Originally Posted by don logan

Betting the over 194 myself, line looks a shade low to me. Either way, GL bro.

BOL to you as well!

[Fed_42420]

I think you are right it seems to high, so Im thinking they know something we don't. I'd take the Over or nothing. GL!!!

[Meestermike]

I use median scores instead of averages myself. I am playing the over 194

L5 gms = 196
SA 103
MIA 93

L5 Hm and Aw = 199
L5 Hm... SA 103
L5 Aw... MIA 96

[TheSchafe]

Big cash night...hit a 5 team parlay that doubled my fledgling bankroll.

[Jak]

Miami just relies on Wade to much