Under 204 and Bulls +2.5 are my picks!!
lets see the bulls win again in Chicago and make some $$
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
-
11-10-09 06:57 PM #1
Nuggets vs. Bulls In Game Thread
-
11-10-09 07:00 PM #2
-
11-10-09 07:00 PM #3
y nuggets? they r playing horribly lately?
-
11-10-09 07:02 PM #4
-
11-10-09 07:14 PM #5
Originally Posted by docrocker
-
11-10-09 07:22 PM #6
-
11-10-09 07:25 PM #7
Under 204.5 for the win!!! (hopefully)
-
11-10-09 09:32 PM #8
That ball is out of Brad Millrs hands. Props to the NBA technology... so many diff. angles it feels like a video game lol.
-
11-10-09 09:32 PM #9
sick ending.....under review right now if brad millers shot went in with 0.3 left...sick ending
-
11-10-09 09:33 PM #10You Come at the King You Best Not Miss
Become A Pro!
Join Date: 01-29-08Posts: 12,576SBR Points: 96
how was there indisputable to over turn the call? Thats bullshit, they called the basket good.
-
11-10-09 09:33 PM #11
god damnit i wish billups didnt miss the free throw on purpose!!!
-
11-10-09 09:34 PM #12
No basket... isn't that some Bull.
-
11-10-09 09:34 PM #13
What was the final? I don't have it on TV and ESPN had it at 90-91 and now 90-89?
-
11-10-09 09:37 PM #14
. Originally Posted by williams22
-
11-10-09 09:38 PM #15
I took bulls+2.5 so I dont care what the decision was. However, I think it was total piece of crap if Bulls won it. How could you got the rebound in control, took a pass and released a shoot all in 0.6 sec? Now that would be bullshit. Billups missed it on purpose because he knew it would not be possible to catch a rebound, get it in control, and still be able to shoot the ball at the other end all in 0.6 secs. They should not even had the opportunity to call time out.
-
11-10-09 09:39 PM #16
denv is shiet
Last edited by MarioBroz; 11-10-09 at 09:39 PM. Reason: denv is shiet
-
11-10-09 09:39 PM #17
it was 0.3 sec secret007 even more unliekly
-
11-10-09 09:39 PM #18
it was pretty clear to me. Originally Posted by Ralphie1412
ball was on his fingers for two frames when the red light was on.
<---- denver ml.
-
11-10-09 09:40 PM #19
obviously this shows to never miss freethrows on purpose...no reason to miss a freethrow on purpose CHAUNCY BILLUPS...TO LOSE THEY WOULD HAVE TO HIT A HALF COURT SHOT!!
-
11-10-09 09:40 PM #20
<------bulls +2 = $$$ Originally Posted by corona
-
11-10-09 09:41 PM #21
0.6 sec when billups had the free throw. TO be able to call a time out, you have to get it in control. IMO, there's no way you could get it in control and shoot another basket in 0.6 sec. That's why Billups missed it. Originally Posted by Brakon00
-
11-10-09 09:42 PM #22
Originally Posted by Brakon00
THey still have timeout so they dont have to hit a half court shot. With 0.6 sec, a clear 3 point shot is possible.
Reply With Quote
