View New Posts
12
  1. #36

    Default

    I should be OK. In the rules there is only a specific statement about OT being included for side, ML, and totals. It never mentions anything about proposition bets. In fact, there is no information about proposition bets at all in the NBA rules. I should win this.

  2. #37
    durito's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-03-06
    Posts: 13,079
    SBR Points: 608
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ico2525 View Post
    I should be OK. In the rules there is only a specific statement about OT being included for side, ML, and totals. It never mentions anything about proposition bets. In fact, there is no information about proposition bets at all in the NBA rules. I should win this.
    no, you won't. sorry.

  3. #38

    Default

    Crap. OK, I'm poor. Someone freeze all my bank accounts, ************, and cancel my internet.

  4. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bleedblue View Post
    I'm pretty sure the push probabilities around the key numbers are too high using this approximation...
    WTF do I know, should have bought the extra point for 25 cents

  5. #40

    Default

    Ugh... what a gutting loss I was on under 31.5 at +110

    Very close...

  6. #41

    Default

    Unders that go over in OT technically were still the right bet.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/14/2005


  7. #42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrLuckyPants View Post
    Ugh... what a gutting loss I was on under 31.5 at +110

    Very close...

    Sucks Lucky, first the 3 doesn't hit for you the game before and now this??? BS!

    Hopefully you hit a prop in the next game...

  8. #43

    Default

    1/2 a refund each should come from Howard (missed FTs) and Van Gundy (bonehead coaching)...
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012


  9. #44

    Default

    Unders that go over in OT technically were still the right bet.
    What a bizarre statement.

  10. #45

    Default

    Actually, what is so bizarre about it? I happen to agree with the guy. Unders and underdogs that lose in OT are the worst beats, because you handcapped the game perfectly through regulation time. So few games go into overtime (percetage-wise) that you really shouldn't incorproate the possibility of OT into your capping.

  11. #46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by donjuan View Post
    What a bizarre statement.
    True.

    Don't get me started about overs that go under in OT.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/14/2005


  12. #47

    Default

    LT, that's donjuan speaking. So I'm pretty sure he means that if the bet was based on proper math, then the bet was 'technically right' at the moment it was placed.

    My remark was directed at those who were bemoaning their luck, but I should have been more careful in my wording.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/14/2005


  13. #48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin7 View Post
    I lose almost half my bets (including this one). So what? I see value, I bet it.
    Oh, no offense intended. I appreciate the in depth analysis and thought that this was a good spot, but I just don't feel as confident betting an under typically. NBA game totals are the only place that I've had a respectable W% on unders.

  14. #49

    Default

    so because the line didn't move again this still has value correct? It's price isn't as offset, but still isn't at -110

First 12
Top