View New Posts
123
  1. #1

    Link The JM "Chase system" $1000 bank roll

    I started the JM Chase system with $1000 back in Mid November.
    The Bank roll is now over $15k.
    I only bet the games from this system in this account.
    It is currently at 47-0 on the series just using A and B bets.
    The only change is, I only buy 2 points not 3, so i get 150/100.
    The system itself was posted awhile back.
    I saw they were also posting the picks and now stopped posting them.
    If wanted i will post the picks in the AM each day.

  2. #2

  3. #3

  4. #4

  5. #5

    Default

    on tuesday there is a system B bet with the spurs correct?

  6. #6

    Default

    Not dissing the system, but how would you be 47-0 on just A and B bets? B bets I can understand, but A?

  7. #7

    Default

    he is 47-0 because all 3 bets didnt fail. if a b and c fail then that puts a loss on the loss column. if a bet fails and then b bet wins it counts as a win in the winner column because you end up winning money in the end.

  8. #8

    Default spurs

    No all bets won on sunday.
    Chicago A bet Won
    Houston B bet Won

    The spurs were not a play this week.
    The won there B game last week on Sat against Chicago.

    Their Game on Sunday against the Lakers was not a system play.
    They are in the same conference.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlazeHaze View Post
    on tuesday there is a system B bet with the spurs correct?
    no there isnt, 1st game was against the lakers (same conference)
    and their tuesday game is against utah (same conference)

    http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...136535-p3.html

  10. #10

    Default

    oh ok i didnt know that it had to be out of conference to make it a system bet. thanks for clearing that up.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlazeHaze View Post
    he is 47-0 because all 3 bets didnt fail. if a b and c fail then that puts a loss on the loss column. if a bet fails and then b bet wins it counts as a win in the winner column because you end up winning money in the end.
    That makes more sense, thanks.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by W0lfy View Post
    That makes more sense, thanks.
    no problem bro. i like the nets play for today.

  13. #13

    Default

    hey so startign with 1000 what was ur very first bet A?

    i dont have that kind of money to put up so im trying to build a bank with $100.. almots to $200 within my first week after morrison plays, ck's secret plays, and other top cappers plays

  14. #14

    Default bettign amount

    My first bet was $51 to win $34 about 5% of my account
    Then after a dozen bets I upped it to 10% of my account.
    but that I found out is too much so I am going down to 6%.

  15. #15

    Default

    The next series of games that fall under the "system" criteria is on Tuesday with the Bobcats going on road. After that come the Clippers starting Friday and then the Bulls starting Saturday. I'd double check the schedules just to be sure before doing anything though. GLA

  16. #16

    Default

    I would be careful with this betting system as I have read a number of threads in the MLB forum last year in which this Morrison bet lost many times. I do it too, but if you are gonna "chase" your bets, you must buy the points and don't be stingy about it. There are no losts in the NBA so far, but toronto and washington would be 2 losses if you didn't buy the points. Good system, but you are still dealing with human beings in which anything can happen. There's bound to be a loss coming, you just want to have a good number of units built up before that 1 loss comes. You get caught before your bankroll is built up, that's it. Money management is key. Don't bet what you can't afford to lose. Betting $34 = 1unit, then one loss is about $550.

    Dbart has the right idea, set aside an amount of money, build up your bankroll and progressively increase your bet. But you just don't want to be caught with a loss before your bankroll is built up. I use it as an aid to pick my games. I double up on B, never made it to C, but I would probably just bet the amount I lost on B and break even.
    Last edited by peeiempee; 01-26-09 at 01:43 AM.

  17. #17

    Default

    @peeiempee the MLB part of the system was changed 2/3 through the last season and JM claims it was 46-0 but everyone that used it knows otherwise, because the implemented aditional rules that would have made it 46-0 but it indeed had a couple of losses.

    Also wanted to say Dbart has a good enough idea of money management that preety much makes it impossible for him to be out of business from one or two C bet fails, and we all know not only that three wont happen, hell not even two fails in a row ever happened.

    Oh and also, going over a lot of plays that were in the system it has shown that going early on the games and buying only 2 points before line movements, since the system plays get the line moved opposite quite often, was a good thing to do, get a better quota and make more money, or simply put, wager less to get more.

  18. #18

    Default

    anybody got the MLB pdf? or perhaps its in the MLB forums omewhere?

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 50lipa View Post
    @peeiempee the MLB part of the system was changed 2/3 through the last season and JM claims it was 46-0 but everyone that used it knows otherwise, because the implemented aditional rules that would have made it 46-0 but it indeed had a couple of losses.

    Also wanted to say Dbart has a good enough idea of money management that preety much makes it impossible for him to be out of business from one or two C bet fails, and we all know not only that three wont happen, hell not even two fails in a row ever happened.

    Oh and also, going over a lot of plays that were in the system it has shown that going early on the games and buying only 2 points before line movements, since the system plays get the line moved opposite quite often, was a good thing to do, get a better quota and make more money, or simply put, wager less to get more.
    Agreed with everything you said, except the "never out of business" part. I don't want a newb coming in and getting their expectations up and getting burned by the next Morrison Bet(charlotte, not saying it will happen but u know what I mean). If you bet 5% of your back roll and lose 2 C bets within a months period, you WILL be out of business, no matter if its 15K or $1000 you started out with. This is gambling...no gaurantees...no nevers.

    Would also like the MLB pdf if someone can send into me or pm me since we can't post it on the forum.

  20. #20

    Default

    If you have 15k you bet more than kelly recommends..seems risky

  21. #21

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlazeHaze View Post
    he is 47-0 because all 3 bets didnt fail. if a b and c fail then that puts a loss on the loss column. if a bet fails and then b bet wins it counts as a win in the winner column because you end up winning money in the end.
    If bet A fails but bet B wins it actually counts as 2 wins for the system, right? Because aren't you making the profit you would've made on A as well as profiting on B due to larger bet size on bet B?

  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schaapattack View Post
    peee...thats why you use kelly and dont martingale...simple
    Can use kelly which is what I recommend on the C bet or even the B bet. But Morrison is based on martigale, he says to double up all 3 times just to win one unit...agreed risky. If you are at 15K or whatever definately quit or drop your wager percentage. But the way dbart got there was not kelly and he is still wagering 5% of his bankroll.
    Last edited by peeiempee; 01-26-09 at 12:07 PM.

  24. #24

    Default bank roll

    When I started with $1000 I was betting 5% of my bank.
    $51 to win 34 150/100 buying 2 points
    After a few bets I upped it to 10% of my bankroll.
    I got some free plays that I played and won on the A bets.
    I also bet a few parlays when i had several games going on the same day and won 2 lost 1.


    I am going to drop my A bet to 6% starting tuesday.
    And I have put in to withdraw my original $1000
    so I am running on profit.

  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roasthawg View Post
    If bet A fails but bet B wins it actually counts as 2 wins for the system, right? Because aren't you making the profit you would've made on A as well as profiting on B due to larger bet size on bet B?
    No not exactly. you bet each series to win 1 unit. I bet the series to win $500 so they bets would work like this.

    A $850- $500
    B $2300- $$1350
    C $6200- $3650

  26. #26

    Default

    Basically if bets A, B and C lose you lost a total of 11 times your initial bet. That is if you start ot with $850 to win $500 and you chase an lose all three bets (which doesn't happen) you would lose 11 * $850 which is $9,350. On the flip side if each unit is $500 in this case then as long as you hit 19 out of 20 system plays you make money. Seeing as this system is 46-0 or something like that so far its a good possibility to et this way.

  27. #27

  28. #28

    Default

    if you buy...

    1pt - risking 11 units to win 1
    2pts - risking 15 units to win 1
    3pts - risking 19 units to win 1

    thats the total number of units lost if the c bet fails. the 3 pts is also based on the -170 from betus.

  29. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eanelson View Post
    Any plays coming up for this system?

    Take a look at Charlotte starting tonight. They qualify. Not to mention they've been a pretty strong ATS team, very much so in LA. I'm on em, good luck to you.

  30. #30

    Default This week plays

    TONIGHT - Tuesday Starts Charlotte series
    Friday starts - LA Clippers series
    Sat Starts Chicago series

  31. #31

  32. #32

    Default

    Bulls are a no play. They covered the t-wolves for the A bet already. Bobcats are tonight. I was thinking about not playing the Clippers and Wizard series. Calculated 24 more plays, excluding these there still will be 20. What are your thoughts about leaving Clips and Wiz out? Clippers have a hell of a lot of injured players. They have gotten blown out 2 games in a row. Wiz may be tanking it for the draft.

  33. #33

    Default

    Yes I all ways buy 2 points

    The bulls are a play starting saturday
    They won there A bet but they are on the road for 6 games.
    That can be split into 2 3game series second starts Saturday.

    I'll check the injuries on game day.

  34. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbartinbwgc View Post
    Yes I all ways buy 2 points

    The bulls are a play starting saturday
    They won there A bet but they are on the road for 6 games.
    That can be split into 2 3game series second starts Saturday.

    I'll check the injuries on game day.
    You have the PDF, is that what morrison says? It can be split into 2, 3 game series?

  35. #35

    Default

    I do hae the pdf file
    It says look for teams with 3 or more away games in a row.
    So 6 would mean they have 3 and then they have another 3.

    As long as they all are from the other conference.

    This happened earlier this season with chicago.
    They had 6 road games and we played it twice.

1234 ... Last
Top