[warriorfan707]

It seems to me that not enough games necessarily win by only one run to warrant betting the money line.

Shouldnt we always bet the run line, the value should pay in the long run I would think.

[warriorfan707]

Theres gotta be some way to simulate this long term over the course of a season and see how it works out betting all run lines as opposed to money lines.

For starters, where can we find data on the percentage of games that end as a 1 run difference.

[Ganchrow]

covers.com has historical money line, total, and score data dating back to the 1999 season.

retrosheet.org has score data dating back to the 19^th century.

[smitch124]

Originally Posted by warriorfan707

Theres gotta be some way to simulate this long term over the course of a season and see how it works out betting all run lines as opposed to money lines.

For starters, where can we find data on the percentage of games that end as a 1 run difference.

I'm sure the relationship between margin of victory and run line odds has been studied very carefully...especially by the books.

[Kritz23]

I figured this out manually on July 5 so I have the right numbers thru July 4. It was a total biotch to do, but you're welcome.

Thru July 4, there were 1,299 games played. 911 of those games, or 70.13% ended in a non 1-run game. The other 388 games ended in a 1-run game.

Not counting the 3 days in March where only 1 game was played (Boston vs Oakland in Japan and Braves vs Nationals opening night) there have been 96 days of baseball and on an average day there are 9.48 games of non 1-run games and 4.02 games of 1-run games.

The worst day for 1-run games was April 1st where there were 7 1-run games and only 1 non 1-run game. The 2nd worst day was April 3rd when there were 7 1-run games and 3 non 1-run games. The 3rd worst day was April 26 where there were 9 1-run games and 7 non 1-run games (the White Sox had a doubleheader that day to put it at 16 games). Every other day thru July 4 had at least 50% or more non 1-run games in a day.

[HeeeHAWWWW]

Originally Posted by smitch124

I'm sure the relationship between margin of victory and run line odds has been studied very carefully...especially by the books.

Absolutely - if they were out of line to any significant degree, they'd be losing lots of money and would notice very fast indeed.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Here's a little tutorial on how to calculate value in run lines:

http://www.smartcapper.com/article_h...line_odds.html

Enjoy.

[Ganchrow]

Originally Posted by LT Profits

Yes but the Money Line is more profitable in the long run because of the high odds you are laying on the +1.5, where you are oftentimes turning an underdog (i.e., +150)

Except that given identical edges, shorter odds bets (i.e. bets at "more negative odds") will be more profitable in the long run from the perspective of bankroll growth.

[Brady2Moss]

Originally Posted by hackattack

I equate the 1.5 run line to a touchdown in football.
We all know how difficult it is in the NFL to pick heavy chalks on a consistent basis.

I prefer the moneyline.

I think people get suckered into runlines when the favorite is laying -200 ML and only -110 RL, its very tempting and people think "its only 1 more run"

Vegas would not offer runlines if they were profit machines, lol well maybe for them it is....

[chipski]

Originally Posted by gordon gekko

Stick to money lines.

the real breakdown would be to provide #s .. but the #s would not truly tell how a particular individual or the smaller % of guys overall could in fact excel in streaks .. and do okay

it would be smart to wager $50 on a -1.5 with the potential to make $60 than to wager $150 with the fav on the ml when the fav loses straight up . you saved $100

the times you wager $150 - $200 on the ml to make a measly $100 on the fav to win straight up and were saved because your fav won by a run would most likely not be the smart way to go overall ..

it all depends on who you are and which teams you WAGERED MORE TO MAKE LESS ON ..
if we looked at 500 games wagered like this , meaning on the ml wagering MORE TO MAKE LESS most would come out on the losing end ..
this is the 1 - 3 top reason why the books are successful , they want you to wager more to make less and hit a 0 - 4 streak , etc . then the ALL IN bs ..
THEY DO NOT WANT PEOPLE TO WAGER LESS TO MAKE MORE AS A WHOLE ..

top 3 reasons sportsbooks make $$
1 > casinos
2 > parlays
3 > wagering big on the ml , wagering more to make less
(who in their right mind would not profit overall going head up against people wagering $1000 to make $500 .. )

[WileOut]

Neither one is any better than the other. Its just like favs and dogs. Neither one is necessarily any better than the other. You have to pick winners and thats the bottom line. Doesnt matter whether it is a dog or fav. Doesnt matter whether its a RL or ML you are betting, bet them blindly and in the long run you will break even.

Go to covers and look at the stats section of MLB. They show how good or bad each team has done against the RL and ML. Its a crap shoot unless you know what you are doing.

[warriorfan707]

It would take some research, but I believe that if we took run lines EVERY GAME, instead of money lines, that we would make more money in the long run.

Think about it, so 1 of the games ends up a 1 run victory, the rest of the ones were all +110 or whatever...

so this poses a very real question?

Are we all ridiculous for not betting the run line every game no matter what? (favorites only)

[juuso]

Originally Posted by warriorfan707

It would take some research, but I believe that if we took run lines EVERY GAME, instead of money lines, that we would make more money in the long run.

Think about it, so 1 of the games ends up a 1 run victory, the rest of the ones were all +110 or whatever...

so this poses a very real question?

Are we all ridiculous for not betting the run line every game no matter what? (favorites only)

-1.5 run lines are fine bets, but comes with increased variance and bankroll volatility compared to more probable ml's or +1.5 rl's. - odds may not look attractive to some people, but they are better expected growth and have less variance.

There are situations laying -1.5 is a good idea and bigger +EV than the ml, but generally markets are efficient and both ml and rl are very close to equal +EV. In that case ml or +1.5 rl should be prefered.

Run lines also have minimally higher juice, but that is small enough to be close to a non-factor.

[Ganchrow]

Originally Posted by juuso

Run lines also have minimally higher juice

Actually, this is often untrue at books such as Pinnacle with its 8¢ MLs and 10¢ RLs and high-juice books with their 20¢ MLs and RLs, when money line odds are close to even.

For example, looking at closing lines for HOU @ WAS on July 13th:

[juuso]

Originally Posted by Ganchrow

Actually, this is often untrue at books such as Pinnacle with its 8¢ MLs and 10¢ RLs and high-juice books with their 20¢ MLs and RLs, when money line odds are close to even.

For example, looking at closing lines for HOU @ WAS on July 13th:

Yes, you are right. I was just referencing to usual 8c vs. 10c vig, but as you pointed out, often times overall juice as a % is lower on the RL when game is close on the ML.

[Scorpion]

Baseball Runs Lines

Betting the Run Line in Major League Baseball



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This article is designed to present information regarding wagering on the Run Line in Major League Baseball. Over 20,000 Major League baseball games played since 1989 have formed the data base used for this study. It takes a great deal of time to go through all of the data and analyze what has happened and we shall be presenting the data to you in segments over the next few weeks, including results broken down by price range.

We begin with an Overview of Run Line betting.

Unlike football and basketball in which pointspreads are used to determine the winners and losers of wagers, baseball has historically been a sport in which bettors merely wager on which team will win the game. As the perceived difference between two competing teams grows, money line odds are used to 'equalize' the chances of a bettor showing a profit over the long run. Two evenly matched teams will be involved in a 'pick em' game. In Sports Books that feature a "ten cents line" you would lay $105 to win $100 on the team you think will win the game. A team that is more moderately favored might be priced as a -140 favorite in which case you would wager $140 to win $100. If you bet on the opponent, the Underdog, you would wager $100 to win $130. As the price of the favorite rises, the 'spread' between the favorite and underdog prices also increases. For example, a -200 Favorite often returns +180 on the Underdog.

Run Line wagering attempts to introduce the pointspread element found in basketball and football wagering to a very limited degree. The Run Line wager involves the laying or taking of one and a half runs with a corresponding adjustment in the price. When you wager on a Favorite and lay the run and half you are wagering that the Favorite will win by two runs or more. A wager on the Underdog at plus a run and a half means that you are wagering on the Underdog to either win the game straight up or lose the game by exactly one run. Obviously you do not have tie games in baseball.

The price adjustments in run line wagering depend upon whether the favored team is at home or on the road. A larger adjustment occurs for Home Favorites since they will often only get at bats in 8 innings if they have the lead after the visiting team hits in the ninth. If the home team trails or is tied in the middle of the ninth inning the odds that they will win the game by more than one run are greatly reduced since it would take a multiple run home run to win by at least two runs since the game would normally end after the go ahead run crosses home plate in the event of any run producing event other than a home run. The road team will ALWAYS bat in the top of the ninth inning regardless of the score so it is easier for the road team to win by more than a run in tight ballgames. In the ninth inning and in extra innings there is no limit on the number of runs the road team can score -- they continue to bat until there are three outs.

A typical example of how the price adjustment works is as follows. A Home Favorite of - 125 often is transformed into an Underdog of roughly + 145 when laying the run and a half, a spread of 70 cents. The corresponding Road Underdog, priced at + 115 straight, is often a Favorite of - 165 when getting the plus run and a half, a spread of 80 cents. If the roles were reversed, a Road Favorite of - 125 would be priced at + 120 when laying the run and a half, a spread of just 45 cents. The corresponding Home Underdog, priced straight at + 115, would be a Favorite of about - 140 when taking the run and a half, a spread of 55 cents.

It is our contention that playing the Run Line and converting a Favorite into an Underdog makes great sense but doing the reverse, taking the run and half with the underdog, is not efficient. Consider the following --

The ONLY way you are hurt when you lay the run and a half and convert a Favorite into an Underdog is when that Favorite WINS BY EXACTLY ONE RUN! In all other situations you are benefitted. When the Favorite wins by 2 runs or more, thereby covering the Run Line, you WIN MORE than if you just played the game straight. You win as if you had played on an Underdog (+ 145 vs. + 100 in the Home Favorite example above or + 120 vs. + 100 in the Road Favorite example). If that Favorite should lose the game you would LOSE LESS than by playing straight (- 100 vs. - 125 in the case of our Home and Road Favorites in our above example). Only when the Favorite wins by exactly one run are you hurt by playing the run line. In such an instance the straight bettor wins while the bettor who laid the run and a half loses.

Conversely, the ONLY way you are helped by taking the runs and a half is when your team LOSES BY EXACTLY ONE RUN. In all other situations straight plays on Underdogs are more beneficial. When your Underdog loses, as they are expected to do, you LOSE MORE by taking the run and a half (-$165 in the case of our Road Underdog above or - $120 in the case of our Home Underdog) than by playing the team straight (lose just $100). When that team pulls the upset and wins you WIN LESS by taking the run and a half since you would normally be getting, for example, + $115 on a straight wager but are getting just + $100 when taking the run and a half. When the team loses by exactly 1 run the straight bettor loses while the bettor who played the plus a run and a half wins.

The central questions to be asked and answered are "How often do Favorites win by exactly 1 Run?" and "How often do Favorites win by 2 Runs or more"?

We have studied the results of over 20,000 Major League Baseball games and in the next few weeks we shall be presenting data that looks into these questions and the many sub-questions. But for starters let's share with you the following data that shows, by percentage, just how often the four possible scenarios have historically broken out for both Home Favorites and Road Favorites --



Percentage of games which produce
the following Result . . . . . HOME FAVORITES ROAD FAVORITES
----------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Win by 2 Runs or More 39.1 % 43.6 %

Win by Exactly 1 Run 18.4 % 11.6 %

Lose by Exactly 1 Run 11.0 % 16.4 %

Lose by 2 Runs or More 31.5 % 28.5 %


Note that we have split the losses into groups of exactly 1 run and more than 1 run. There really is no need for this distinction since a loss is a loss is a loss when it comes to playing the Favorite. Only the 1 Run win has significance. What we want to show is that although between 28% and 30% of all games are decided by 1 run, ONLY those in which the FAVORITE WINS BY 1 RUN have an impact of the result of betting the Run Line!

Look for our next installment in about a week in which we will delve further into these numbers to examine their impact on Run Line betting.

[Ganchrow]

Originally Posted by Scorpion

Baseball Runs Lines

Betting the Run Line in Major League Baseball

-snip-

My response to this Andy Iskoe-authored piece of crap.

[beaneaters]

I don't know. At least I understood it. But I don't pretend to know what I am talking about.

[Ganchrow]

Originally Posted by beaneaters

But I don't pretend to know what I am talking about.

This may well be what sets us most apart.

For you see, I do pretend to know what I'm talking about.

[beaneaters]

Congratulations. You're a hero to us all.