View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Are these parlays correlated?

    Hockey - 51 New York Rangers/New Jersey Devils over 5½ +100 for Game
    Hockey - 52 New Jersey Devils -1½ +230 for Game




    Hockey - 53 Columbus Blue Jackets/Vancouver Canucks over 5½ +110 for Game
    Hockey - 54 Vancouver Canucks -1½ +205 for Game

  2. #2

    Default

    Slightly so, most book won't allow them. In the long run you have a small edge playing those.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012


  3. #3

    Default

    A little learning is a dangerous thing.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RickySteve View Post
    A little learning is a dangerous thing.
    Thanks, thats helpful
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012


  5. #5

    Default

    I am more partial to the +1.5/UNDER parlays myself.

  6. #6

    Default

    Both sides are most certainly correlated, and if you find a place that allows it and is giving you reasonable numbers go for it if you don't mind the danger of pissing them off.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    I am more partial to the +1.5/UNDER parlays myself.


    Anyone know a bookmaker that accept soccer parlays like this?

    Nvm this, just hedge the correct scores and you get the same thing
    Last edited by Hybris; 10-06-09 at 12:51 PM.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hybris View Post


    Anyone know a bookmaker that accept soccer parlays like this?

    Nvm this, just hedge the correct scores and you get the same thing
    No, and they wouldn't tell you even if they did.

    Betting correct scores is sort of the same thing, except those are priced correctly and CPs aren't.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RickySteve View Post
    No, and they wouldn't tell you even if they did.

    Betting correct scores is sort of the same thing, except those are priced correctly and CPs aren't.
    Ok tell me if this is correct
    Odds from betsafe...
    Denmark - Sweden 10.10.2009, 20.00 CET


    Sweden win @+185, Under 2.5 goals @-154 that parlay will pay +370 but it isnt allowed.

    Hedge 0-1 @+700 and 0-2@+1600 correct scores and you get the price @+444


  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hybris View Post
    Ok tell me if this is correct
    Odds from betsafe...
    Denmark - Sweden 10.10.2009, 20.00 CET


    Sweden win @+185, Under 2.5 goals @-154 that parlay will pay +370 but it isnt allowed.

    Hedge 0-1 @+700 and 0-2@+1600 correct scores and you get the price @+444

    Well Sweden at effectively -0.5 doesn't correlate with the under. It would correlate slightly with the over but you can't cover that with exact scores.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012


  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hybris View Post
    Ok tell me if this is correct
    Odds from betsafe...
    Denmark - Sweden 10.10.2009, 20.00 CET


    Sweden win @+185, Under 2.5 goals @-154 that parlay will pay +370 but it isnt allowed.

    Hedge 0-1 @+700 and 0-2@+1600 correct scores and you get the price @+444

    Compare draw+u2½ parlay to 0-0 & 1-1 straight.

  12. #12

    Default

    You guys think there is any merit to play them as 2 diffrent parlays with another team. Since the bookmakers dont allow you to play for example Jellybeans parlays then parlay:

    Hockey - 52 New Jersey Devils -1½ +230 for Game
    and
    Hockey - 54 Vancouver Canucks -1½ +205 for Game
    as a 2team parlay, then do the same for the totals

    Hockey - 51 New York Rangers/New Jersey Devils over 5½ +100 for Game
    and
    Hockey - 53 Columbus Blue Jackets/Vancouver Canucks over 5½ +110 for Game

    If the first 2 team parlay hit there is a greater chance that the other also hit? Do it at diffrent bookmakers if you think they will shut you up?

    Sorry if I´m to stupid here

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    I am more partial to the +1.5/UNDER parlays myself.
    Sharpest post in this thread

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hybris View Post
    You guys think there is any merit to play them as 2 diffrent parlays with another team. Since the bookmakers dont allow you to play for example Jellybeans parlays then parlay:

    Hockey - 52 New Jersey Devils -1½ +230 for Game
    and
    Hockey - 54 Vancouver Canucks -1½ +205 for Game
    as a 2team parlay, then do the same for the totals

    Hockey - 51 New York Rangers/New Jersey Devils over 5½ +100 for Game
    and
    Hockey - 53 Columbus Blue Jackets/Vancouver Canucks over 5½ +110 for Game

    If the first 2 team parlay hit there is a greater chance that the other also hit? Do it at diffrent bookmakers if you think they will shut you up?

    Sorry if I´m to stupid here
    Not your best work.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RickySteve View Post
    Not your best work.
    I agree, just delete it from your mind

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    I am more partial to the +1.5/UNDER parlays myself.
    Has this been winning this year??
    1105pts

    TOP SPORTSBOOK
    WINNER
    5/9/2012


  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bluehorseshoe View Post

    Has this been winning this year??
    some..

Top