[Snowball]

she doesn't think she'll win. umm, well she IS the favorite according to the bookmakers. 8/13 odds. next is Meryl Streep 7/4 - others, no-names.

I don't think Meryl's impersonation of Julia Childs, as well done as I heard it was, is enough for the Academy to pass up the chance to fulfill Sandra's career at age 45 and award her finally with Best Actress. She gave a heart-wrenching, tough and "real" performance in The Blind Side (or so I hear).
These human-interest type performances complete with it being a true-life story with that football player still alive helps her odds too.

Streep has won before, at least once. The others ? well.. nobody cares about them. This is Sandra's baby. at 45 years old, probably her final chance to get a real Oscar and not just a nomination because the stats say they favor under-40.

Sandra is the bet. Payout .62/1 is not bad. It's her turn. Perfectly placed odds.
Not too high (to pay too much), not too low (to give away the KNOWN fact).

[Nismo]

Streep was perfect as Julia Childs. The film was bad and the rest of the acting was poor. I also don't think Streep was a big enough part of the movie. Bullock was good but it was an easier role. Bullock will probably win. I think it would be cool if they split some votes and Carey Mulligan gets the upset at +1000.

[Snowball]

it's her turn.
just the other day she became only the 2nd actress to appear in person to
accept a Razzie. (Halle Berry for Catwoman the first)

wouldn't it be fitting for Sandra to win a Razzie and an Oscar in the same year !

[DrStale]

Bullock will probably win, but I like the value in Streep at +300.

[Snowball]

Streep went off at 7 to 4 according to my book.....

[andywend]

Oprah Winfrey once again showing what a racist she truly is.

Has she ever done anything in the entertainment industry which didn't focus on her own race?

[bubbls]

het

[bubbls]

hey

[bubbls]

hey there

[bubbls]

hello

[bubbls]

ywsterday when i was young

[bubbls]

things go wrong sometimes