| SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks Recommended Books | ||
| 1. Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | SBR Rating A+ | The Greek Review |
| 3. BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| 4. BetJamaica | SBR Rating A+ | BetJamaica Review |
| 5. LegendZ Sports | SBR Rating A+ | LegendZ Review |
| SBR Posters' Poll - March 2009 View Complete Results | ||
| 1. BetJamaica | 251 total points | BetJamaica Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | 217 total points | The Greek Review |
| 3. 5Dimes | 181 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| 4. Matchbook | 159 total points | Matchbook Review |
| 5. Pinnacle Sports | 148 total points | Pinnacle Sports Review |
![]() |
View New Posts |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
Spring practices have wrapped up, so it's time to take another look at the preseason top 25. Injuries, suspensions and dismissals littered the spring, but how did they affect the rankings? Well, to start things off, there's been a change at the top.
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
OSU would finish 5th in the SEC east.
__________________
RIP #21 |
||||
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
It's better that OSU start #1 then finish #1 or #2 at the end of the regular season and have them play in the championship game. That might honestly be why they are putting them #1 now.
|
||||
|
|
#4 | |||||
|
Quote:
When USC punished them they'll drop to 2.
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
Go Bucks! OSU will beat USC in Southern California I don't believe Mark Sanchez has it yet, buckeyes have too much experience and alas USC is not a SEC team : )
|
||||
|
|
#6 | |||||
|
Quote:
Why don't you believe Mark Sanchez has it yet? OSU is not as talented as USC despite the fact that USC lost 10 players to the draft. Add to that the fact that OSU went to the title game over USC and its in California? OSU 0-1
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#7 | |||||
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Baron_Mynd; 05-14-08 at 11:55 AM.. |
|||||
|
|
#8 | |||||
|
Quote:
What makes you think that Mark Sanchez 'does not have it yet'?
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#9 | |||||
|
Quote:
1) more often than not the professionals do get it wrong. Or so it seems. 2) USC is loaded, OSU plays in a mid-major conference. anything more?
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#10 | ||||
|
1) You must not have seen that alongside USC, OSU is loaded as well can't see why they both are top 5 recruiting classes in the past 5 years, can't be too much of a difference NOT to mention OSU returns 3 All-Americans, and 1 is a heisman front-runner..but i guess that doesn't mean too much..weird...
2) Big-Ten against Pac-10 teams last year 1-0, guess records don't mean anything..mid-major?..well guess that doesn't say too much about the Pac-10, not too mention you can glance at the article above ....Big Ten, 5 teams in the top 25, Pac-!0...3.... Anything else? |
||||
|
|
#11 | |||||
|
Quote:
Factually, OSU has not been in the top 5 in recruiting in any of the last 5 years; not one. In fact, they've haven't been in the top 8 in any of the last 5 years. I just got any idea, how about instead of making up facts, you actually read and learn a little something? perhaps then you'd be able to have a semi-productive conversation and i wouldn't have to explain things to you. or, if you just don't know anything, ask a question instead of replying like a smart ass without actually having any knowledge. ![]() The rest of what you said is meaningless. preseason rankings mean little and USC is in a different class than the rest of the pac-10. USC had 10 players drafted this season and they'll have 3 in the first 10 in 09, OSU will not. Mcknight is the better RB, Sanchez will be the best QB in the game, USCs defense is the better defense, and USC is at home. you ask, 'anything else'? im still waiting for your first valid point. for future reference, kido...here is where OSU finished in recruiting in each of the last 5 seasons: 2007:15 2006:12 2005:12 2004:9 2003:41 lata ![]()
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#12 | ||||
|
Lol, funny man...I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong, and I was with the recruiting argument OSU is in the top 5 this year at #4 while USC stands at #8, but other than that...your right..
Your USC is better than the Pac-10 argument is invalid sir, because I can sit here and make the same argument about Ohio State...you're the one who brought up the whole mid-major argument i was just pointing out your ridiculous statement is all. LOL at Mcknight being better than Beanie Wells...but i guess he's proven as much..goodness same with mark sanchez USC's defense is good, not great...and I'm not arguing that OSU's is for future reference AND.. 10 players drafted this year from USC and 3 more next year in the top 10 has nothing to do with anything these petty side arguments amuse me...Because I'm here to discredit your faulty logic...geesh..http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7999670 ..check the top 5 lol...guess you got USC mixed up with OSU... Guess you might want to take your own advice and not talk as much and read up!, because you actually are doing nothing but making yourself look less knowledgeable.. try harder guy! Last edited by Baron_Mynd; 05-15-08 at 12:50 AM.. |
||||
|
|
#13 | |||||
|
Quote:
other than that? OSU was in the top 5 once, but those players aren't even on campus yet. Clearly you're not suggesting that those are the kids who are going to make a difference vs. USC, are you? ![]() btw, usc actually had the 2nd best class, they just didnt offer all that many players. OSU was 3rd in stars per recruit this season. Impressive to say the least. You could make that argument about OSU if OSU had won the big-10 title as many times in a row as USC. Wells has had more opportunity and hes a great back, but Mcknight can do things that Wells can not. Wells is a phenomenal talent, no knock on him. imo, McKnight has a chance to be a better college player while Wells is a future pro-bowler in the league. As for the QBs, Todd Boeckman wouldn't make USC's roster, so I'll stick with Sanchez. Mark was 16 of 24 with 3 Tds and over 200 yards in the USC spring game and he beat out another 5 star QB for the starting job. USC's defense will be better than just good. They'll have the best two LBs in the country, a top 5 safety, a top 5 DE. They have a first round pick, or more, at every level. As for the draft, Cushing, Mays, Maualuga and Mola could all be top 10 picks. This is not from a draft service, this is from an NFL scout. No need to read when i can just speak with people who work in the league. ![]() So, hopefully you've taken a moment to learn a bit. Thanks for the recruiting tidbits. Maybe you should follow recruiting first and then talk about it? ![]()
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#14 | ||||
|
Like I said before...i guess being gracious does not really get you anywhere but I was wrong about the recruiting...but i mean hit a guy when he's down is very classy I must say...
Those guys you talk to in the league about drafting will probably tell you Laurinitis, Jenkins, Wells, and maybe even Boone COULD be in the top 10, and i only bring this up because you said OSU won't have any players in the top 10...once again just talking sir not really thinking.... OSU has the BEST LB in the country first of all lol, a guy named Laurinitis you might have heard of him, Probably the top CB in Jenkins....Like I said USC's defense is good they had as many good defensive players last year and lost to Stanford is all ...but i guess that's another story Todd Boeckman....I don't like him so no argument there....I only hope we mix it up with Antonio Henton and maybe even Tyrelle Pryor...but who knows... Mark Sanchez and Mcknight obviously are predicted to be very good, at least mcknight, I'm only saying i'll believe it when i see it....Wells, and Boeckman have proved something...and i usually go off proof than assumptions.. In the end...if USC wins it won't be the end of the world I just figure that OSU has a might good chance and USC is always bound to lose being however big the gians people want to believe they are, either if it Oregon St..or Stanford.. I seen your a Tennessee fan well you guys might want to start rebuilding for the upcoming years were going to play y'all. We gotta beat some SEC teams sometime : ) |
||||
|
|
#15 | |||||
|
Quote:
The best LB in the nation is Maualuga. If Cushing is healthy, he will be the first LB taken. His number will be great, but what he'll do at the combine will lock him up as the #1 LB to go off the board. James is an amazing player, we'll see how things pan out. What was gracious, btw, was me correcting you. You admitting you were wrong was not gracious, perhaps it was a bit humbling though. It's not good that i know more about your team than you do. ![]() Jenkins only concern ive heard about is off the field stuff. Im not sure that there is much to it, but i've heard there were some concerns. He's a lock down guy and someone i wanted my Redskins to get if he had come out this season. Did you just reference a loss to standford? well lets reference the single common opponent the two teams had last year, shall we? ![]() If you only go off what you've seen, and never off of the word of the best scouts/coaches in the country, you'll find yourself late on value. I trust people who have proven to know what they're talking about. Pete Carroll for instance. Sanchez was the #1 QB coming out of HS, so im not sure why you would say McKnight is 'predicted' to do big things but then you seem less certain about Mark. Each is predicted to do 'big things', I'd venture to guess that Sanchez will finish higher in the Heisman running than Boekman. I remember the last time we played OSU, what a day what a day. Nice option pitch off the helmet of Eddie George and the Vols were in business. Not sure what kind of play they were running, but it was brilliant. The vols will have the best secondary in the nation, a great oline, great wrs, great, rbs, and good Lbs....but we'll see how Crompton does and if we can find a way to get pressure on the opposing QBs. As of now, we'll have to blitz every play or risk leaving our secondary in coverage for hours at a time.
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#16 | ||||
|
I knew the Illinois card would be pulled once i brought up Stanford...thought I'd throw it out there anyways : )
Mark Sanchez might have been the #1 recruit, but than again I'm going off of personal experience by a guy named Justin Zwick who was the #5 QB recruit of his class....didn't pan out too well, AND we got a #1 QB recruit ourselves in Terelle Pryor so going off your thought's we might as well put him up against Mark and see them dual out their potential! |
||||
|
|
#17 | |||||
|
Quote:
Not sure what that means. A true freshman QB has nothing in common with Sanchez. USC's back up was the #2 QB in his class, either would start for OSU right now. Then again, I'd take Pryor as a freshman over either one of them as freshman. haha the Illinois game had to come out. Not only did i win both of those games (ill ml over osu and usc -13 over ill) but i had to fight fire with fire. As for Zwick, what a turd he was. Now, send Dorian Bell our way and i promise to say something nice about OSU in the near future. ![]()
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
|
|
#18 | ||||
|
Nope were keeping Dorian, him along with Etienne Sabino this year...our linebacker core will be a solid as usual for the future!
|
||||
|
|
#19 | |||||
|
Quote:
I thought the vols had a legit shot with Sabino last year, i was surprised to see him get plucked out of the south. Williams, kid from texas, is one of the more impressive LBs on film and the vols are on his list, but he seems like an LSU lock to most.
__________________
RIP #21 |
|||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|