[jjgold]

Like rolling the dice boys

Very difficult game to beat

I would take bases over this anyday

[Mudcat]

+1200 ML dog South Florida leading Louisville 38-7 late in the 3rd quarter.

Go figure.

[Mr Nuts]

yea i had louisville -20 tonight sucks

[clonecat]

Purdue is my major complaint of the day. Up 8 late allowing a 4th down conversion and a two point conversion. It seems as every gambler loses more close games than he wins.

[Montreal514]

Yeah I'm just wondering who else got screwed over this weekend by Utah's "let them score a TD on their last drive" to f*** up the spread and also by Florida's "let's not do anything in the second half" and allow them to score 3 unanswered TD's. Got screwed over by two BS backdoor covers this week. Doesn't matter to them because they still get the W though.

[David]

USC very strong in second half. Were down 3 at halftime.

[BuddyBear]

Seems like there are a lot of backdoor covers...i have no evidence for this but intuitively if you play more underdogs you should get a lot more of those backdoor covers like I had Kentucky today...i am not even sure what happened as i was out of town...but i also had Oregon and i left the wedding they were up 13-0...came back saw the score 45-13!

You never know what to expect in gambling...that's why you have to wait till the last second of every game!

[freebie]

Originally Posted by Mudcat

+1200 ML dog South Florida leading Louisville 38-7 late in the 3rd quarter.

Go figure.

Did you actually put money on +1200?
The most I would imagine anyone would put down is probably $25-$100?

[Relentless]

+1200 is a nice line on that dog. Where did you find +1200?

[aceking]

I had North Carolina to beat NC State , +400

[LVHerbie]

Originally Posted by Montreal514

Yeah I'm just wondering who else got screwed over this weekend by Utah's "let them score a TD on their last drive" to f*** up the spread and also by Florida's "let's not do anything in the second half" and allow them to score 3 unanswered TD's. Got screwed over by two BS backdoor covers this week. Doesn't matter to them because they still get the W though.

Obviously they don't care about the spread and one has to consider that when betting big favorites... but it works both ways and, theorically, should average out... For example I got screwed on the Purdue game today but was on the right side in the Air Force game...

[jjgold]

Way too hard to predict colege kids performances as they are not pros and not as consistent as pros mentally or physically

[EBone]

College used to be a bastian of money-grabbing for me. This year, I have absolutely sucked. No two ways about it. I need to re-evaluate.


E

[Mudcat]

Originally Posted by freebie

Did you actually put money on +1200?
The most I would imagine anyone would put down is probably $25-$100?

Originally Posted by Relentless

+1200 is a nice line on that dog. Where did you find +1200?

No I didn't have money on it. I'm just always researching large ML dogs on a spreadsheet. On ncaaf, I'll only bet up to around +700 right now (but it's been a disaster so far this year).

I can't tell you exactly where I found it. I was checking a few books and I didn't make a note of it. Had to be either Pinnacle or Olympic.

[THESCOUT]

Really! true genius, a profound truth revealed

[sergfro]

The Louisville/South Florida game opened at -22 with 80% of the public on them. Line dropped to -19.5 go figure..sharps knew something was up

[Relentless]

Mudcat, I have not found large ML dogs in college football to be a good bet, largely because of the increase in the spread between the fav and dog and the moneyline gets larger. Conversely, I would say betting on the large ML fav is even a worse bet. The lines seem to be pretty much on for these bets imo.

[Mudcat]

Originally Posted by Relentless