[bigboydan]

This idea will only make matters even worse more than make things better. It's watered down enough as it is, and it will only add even more days to the season. Just scrap the BCS altogether and go to a playoff.

BCS conferences vote to expand pool to avoid problem

In an attempt to avoid a potential headache at the end of the regular season, the commissioners of the six BCS football conferences have voted to expand the pool of BCS at-large candidates from 14 to 18.

The new rule goes into effect only if there aren't enough teams among the top 14 of the final BCS standings to fill 10 slots in the BCS National Championship Game, Orange Bowl, Sugar Bowl, Fiesta Bowl and Rose Bowl.

The new rule was approved by commissioners for the 2007 season and will be announced by the BCS on Tuesday.

"The commissioners voted that in a case where there wasn't enough teams in the at-large pool, they would expand it by four," said Charles Bloom, associate commissioner of the SEC and BCS media coordinator. "If there were enough teams to fill the BCS from the pool of 14, it wouldn't be expanded."

Under the current BCS rules, champions of the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, Pac-10 and SEC conferences receive automatic berths in the five BCS games. The top two teams in the final BCS standings will play in the Jan. 7 BCS National Championship Game at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans.

Teams from the five non-BCS leagues (Conference USA, Mid-American, Mountain West, Sun Belt and WAC) receive an automatic BCS berth only if they finish in the top 12 of the final BCS standings, or in the top 16 and ranked ahead of a champion from one of the six BCS conferences. No more than one such team from the non-BCS leagues can receive an automatic berth in one season.

The new rule doesn't change the qualification requirements for non-BCS teams, Bloom said.

If no team from a non-BCS league meets the criteria, then the four BCS at-large spots can be filled by teams that won at least nine games and finished in the top 14 of the final standings.

But here's the potential problem this season: Only two teams from one BCS league can play in BCS bowl games.

There are currently four Big 12 teams, three SEC teams and three Pac-10 teams ranked in the top 14 of the BCS standings. Two ACC teams and one team from both the Big Ten and Big East are among the top 14.

If the season ended now, there would be enough eligible teams to fill the 10 BCS spots.

But each of the ACC teams (No. 8 Virginia Tech and No. 14 Boston College) would be in danger of falling out of the top 14 if they lose again. The Hokies play No. 16 Virginia Saturday. The winner of that game faces the Eagles in the Dec. 1 ACC championship game in Jacksonville, Fla. Boston College finishes the regular season at home against Miami on Saturday.

Two teams from non-BCS leagues have a chance of reaching the top 12 in the final BCS standings. Hawaii, one of two unbeaten teams left in major college football, plays No. 19 Boise State at Aloha Stadium on Friday night. The No. 15 Warriors might move into the top 12 if they beat the Broncos and Washington on Dec. 1 and finish 12-0. But the Broncos, who would finish 11-1 by beating Hawaii, might not jump seven spots to No. 12 in the BCS standings, even after beating the unbeaten Warriors.

"I don't think [the new rule] really has an effect on Boise State or Hawaii," WAC Commissioner Karl Benson said Monday night. "This isn't anything that reduces or eliminates Boise State's or Hawaii's chances of getting into the BCS. Obviously, if they get into the top 12, it's still guaranteed."

The teams which would figure to benefit most from the rules change include No. 17 Illinois, which finished its season with a 9-3 record, and No. 20 Connecticut, which would move up in the rankings if it upsets No. 3 West Virginia on Saturday. The loser of the ACC championship game also might be eligible for a BCS at-large berth under the new rule.

[pico]

i suspect this has something to do with getting michigan eligible

michigan should automatically get invited to a bowl game every year regardless of how they perform in the regular season

[Wheell]

The WAC just got nailed. That is stunning. Basically, the Hawaii-Boise St. winner will not be in the top 12, so no auto-bid there. Also, there likely will not be an auto bid via outranking the top team from the Big East (WV), SEC (LSU), Big 12 (who knows), Pac 10 (ditto), and Big 10 (Ohio St.). That leaves the ACC, but it is likely that the ACC champion will outrank the WAC champ. Now, the way the WAC was getting into the BCA was the top 14 rule. The SEC, Big 12, and Pac 10 were all likely to have 2 eligible teams. The ACC, Big East, and Big 10 were only going to have one. 10 slots, 9 eligible teams from the big 6 conferences, and 1 WAC qualifier. That is why the WAC winner was likely going to get in. Now, with the cutoff at 18, not 14, the WAC gets kicked out.

College football is about as self serving as it gets. Nice work

[pico]

there are some conferences are full of shitty teams...even if they go undefeated, no one would want to watch a MAC, WAC, or Sunbelt champion in a bowl game.

[pico]

also add C-USA

[Wheell]

Yeah, that Boise St.-OU game sucked balls. BORING.

[pico]

Yeah, that Boise St.-OU game sucked balls. BORING.

that was the exception

[Wheell]

exception compared to what norm? What are your counterexamples? Utah-Pittsburgh? It isn't Utah's fault that they didn't get to face Auburn or USC...

[astro61200]

that was the exception

I'd much rather watch a WAC or C-USA team than a Big Ten squad... atleast the WAC and C-USA they put up points, even if it is on bad defenses

In the Big Ten you have lackluster offenses going against pretty solid defenses... but if those defenses run into any type of speed they are eatten alive

Exhibit A: Ohio State/Florida NC Game 2007
Exhibit B: Michigan/Appalachian State
Exhibit C: Michigan/Oregon