I think it is.
UNDER 51
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
-
11-05-09 11:03 AM #1
VT @ ECU... is the total 51 about 10 points too high?
-
11-05-09 11:32 AM #2
it sure is considering ECU is going to struggle to score at all
-
11-05-09 11:48 AM #3
i agree with the under
-
11-05-09 11:49 AM #4
and i never bet unders. i swear i probably have a 20:1 ratio betting overs to unders in my life.
-
11-05-09 11:49 AM #5
-
11-05-09 11:57 AM #6
seems like one of those games where its gonna take one team scoring 35+ to hit an over 51, huh?
-
11-05-09 11:59 AM #7
very true......only problem is VT could do that
Originally Posted by stats13
-
11-05-09 12:17 PM #8
The problem with this total is ECU defense is not that good. That's why this total is not low.
-
11-05-09 12:29 PM #9
Originally Posted by Dbldown11
your kidding right they won ouright in 2008 it is now 2009.
-
11-05-09 12:33 PM #10
underachievers z, Both DTs and DE CJ wilson are all NFL guys (projected 3 or 4 rounders), alot of beef on that defensive line both DEs are over 270 and DTs over 300. most of the defensive starters are Sr. they have talent imo but yeah they should and could be better than they are. They have played better D in recent weeks. I love that this could be a tough match up up front for VTs run first game but i hate to take the under with two mobile QBs that can make something happen when things break down. Originally Posted by ZBOIZ
-
11-05-09 12:36 PM #11
What is your point? ECU is not as good as they were in 2008 and Va. Tech is better than they were in 2008....... Originally Posted by 311
One year can make a difference. Especially considering that Va. Tech is not looking past ECU at all this year.
I'm not quite sure your logic is going to be very profitable for you if you go about picking games based off of last years scores
-
11-05-09 01:27 PM #12
NO WAY Va Tech was better last year than this year in my opinion. They won the conference and went to a BCS game last year... and won that!
Originally Posted by Dbldown11
What is your point? ECU is not as good as they were in 2008 and Va. Tech is better than they were in 2008.......
One year can make a difference. Especially considering that Va. Tech is not looking past ECU at all this year.
I'm not quite sure your logic is going to be very profitable for you if you go about picking games based off of last years scores
-
11-05-09 01:44 PM #13
zboiz thinks the defenses suck just cuz they arent sec
-
11-05-09 01:51 PM #14
The more i look into this game the more i hate the under i was going to play it but call me crazy seems like ECU +14 (buy the half) is the play i looked up pat pinkneys history vs bud fosters defense and its pretty good 2007 he went 14 of 25 for 115 yards 48 rushing yards no ints... in 2008 19 of 23 211 yards 1 TD no int 24 rushing yards 1 rushing td. ECU has a slight edge on both the offensive and defensive lines and i watched a piss poor unc offensive line push VT around i think ECU's is better. ECU RB dominque lindsay is avg 5.8 yac thats not magic i think the big boys up front are getting it done. we need to all come together and figure out how to pound the books this is a tough one Originally Posted by teaserpleaser
-
11-05-09 03:01 PM #15
Originally Posted by stats13
never said the defenses suck I said ECU defense is not that great. I really do expect V.T to handle business tonight!
-
11-05-09 04:52 PM #16
The Under looks safe at 51.
-
11-05-09 04:54 PM #17
Va Tech Rolls........
35-10.
Bang..........
The "Pirates" are gonna get some "Butt Pirate" love tonight.
-
11-05-09 04:56 PM #18
ECU's defense will have something to say about V.Tech scoring too many points. This game should be an UNDER
-
11-05-09 04:59 PM #19
Which still means Under could cash. Originally Posted by SmackdownV
-
11-05-09 08:15 PM #20
ok, 13 points scored with 1 min to go in the half. under backers got some lucky breaks but thats the way it rolls sometimes.
lets go into half 13-0 please, 13-3 worst case.
-
11-05-09 08:16 PM #21
ok, 13 points scored with 1 min to go in the half. under backers got some lucky breaks but thats the way it rolls sometimes.
lets go into half 13-0 please, 13-3 worst case.
-
11-05-09 08:20 PM #22
jeez. kick the fg. 13-3 please. if ecu scores a td here you gotta be shittin me
-
11-05-09 08:22 PM #23
ok, not ideal but decent. 13-3 is doable. coulda been WAY worse
under 35 2nd half, lets do it
-
11-05-09 09:11 PM #24
this one is gonna cruise in easily
-
11-05-09 10:35 PM #25
wow that was easy
-
11-05-09 10:43 PM #26
Nice hit stats! Easy money!
-
11-06-09 12:11 AM #27
-
11-06-09 02:02 PM #28
went to bet the under 51 and the line had moved to 52.5 so i doubled up...wish they were all so easy.
Reply With Quote
