[KASHMAN24]

G.tech is 5-0 ats in last 5. They are on a roll. I see no way they don't cover this number -16.

Early research says they cover at home by 2 touchdowns.

If i were you guys i would get it at -16

can anybody make a convincing argument why they do not cover this number.

[Jackets_Fan]

Tech's defense has sucked against the read option this year (Miss. St. and Vandy). Wake Forest also runs the read option.

[ji03]

Yeah, they gave up bunches of points to Vandy.

[KASHMAN24]

Ok, i know they can give up a lot of points, and you guys make great points. The way im looking at it. They score at will and give up points, but wake forest cannot keep up. Something like 48-23.

[HoulihansTX]

The Linesmakers know that the public is latching on to GT. So if you missed the boat on GT when their lines were favorable, dont look for anything worth betting now. Just bet them OVER, when they play on the road. This upcoming game against Wake Forest has OVER written all over it.

[jds07v]

Wake's QB ( Skinner ) is questionable with the concussion suffered against miami. i've been riding gt, but at -16 i think the ride is over

[jds07v]

also, 68% of the public on GT and the line has fallen a full point...

[Jackets_Fan]

Tech's line moved against the public last week as well and they still covered like a champ. Just saying.

[jds07v]

if the line drops to two scores, i might come back on the wagon

[KUGAMER]

Over looks great here! Just too many point with Tech's piss poor defense

[HoulihansTX]

Forget RLM in CFB. Not a proven profit maker. I bet Okla St. against Baylor two weeks ago even though the RLM pointed towards taking Baylor. Okla St. covered easily even though 60% were on Okla St., but the line dropped 2 whole points within an hour B4 kick-off.

I got burnt in the SD St. game last week. 60%+ on SD St., but line dropped 3 points(RLM) from the opening line. I still feel the reason for them not covering (-16) was that they were in a look ahead spot, since they play TCU this week.

[bobby heenan]

Forget RLM in CFB. Not a proven profit maker. I bet Okla St. against Baylor two weeks ago even though the RLM pointed towards taking Baylor. Okla St. covered easily even though 60% were on Okla St., but the line dropped 2 whole points within an hour B4 kick-off.

I got burnt in the SD St. game last week. 60%+ on SD St., but line dropped 3 points(RLM) from the opening line. I still feel the reason for them not covering (-16) was that they were in a look ahead spot, since they play TCU this week.

i also hammered ok state there...did it early in the week too...at 9.5...that just jumped out at me...i really wonder if sharps were hammering down so they could come back and play ok st. at the 9.5 number?? because that was just too easy...ive also been hammering tech lately...and nearly shit when they went into half tied last week with a 28-14 lead....but i totally agree with you....i think its time to stop playing them

[spongerat]

RLM has been getting killed this year

[rm18]

If Skinner plays Wake can easily win this game, I think they can stop the running game of Tech better than any team they have played all year.

[jjgold]

When something looks too easy the opposite usually happens.

Good Luck Chief