I posted this in another thread, but I wanted you to address this...
Who was in on the fix? All of the officials? Some of them?
Did they bet Iowa ML or to cover the spread?
If spread, how did they know Iowa could be counted on to score the 20+ points in the 4th needed to cover the spread?
If you think moneyline at -750ish, you are retarded. Why not bet Indiana moneyline at about +600 and screw Iowa if money is the goal?
If the fix was in to get Iowa to a BCS game, why not wait until Ohio St. to fix? Certainly they know that will be the real test and wouldn't put their career on the line for no reason. Were they following orders?
What is the master plan in fixing this game? They can't be counted on to win the season out, and they couldn't be counted on to score the points on their own in the fourth. Would you keep a fix up after the quarterback you bet on threw 4 picks in one quarter? I'd probably just be happy to keep my job and try to fix another game later....
Furthermore, why would the refs even bet on Iowa at all in this game... Indiana seems like the much better choice for someone who is trying to cheat to win money.
Seriously.... isn't it more likely they made some bad calls, with the majority of them against Indiana, and the fact that you all lost money is making you stupid.
Last edited by Indecent; 10-31-09 at 04:24 PM.
|
