[DREEZY]

Both great plays, but I give the edge to Ohio St. (-14)

Thoughts?

[twincities77]

OSU. USC is the wrong end I believe.

[RICHIE801]

ND is the correct play. OSU and USC are both PUBLIC teams and betting on either one can be hazardous to your bank roll.

[Dbldown11]

I would take USC.

Richie you're just completely wrong in your statement. 67% of the "public" is on Notre Dame....Notre Dame is as public as they come by the way. And the line in the game has dropped from -11 to -10 because of it.....So what are you talking about?

[RICHIE801]

I would take USC.

Richie you're just completely wrong in your statement. 67% of the "public" is on Notre Dame....Notre Dame is as public as they come by the way. And the line in the game has dropped from -11 to -10 because of it.....So what are you talking about?

I didnt mean USC was a public team in this particular match-up. Take your Trojans as double digit favs with a freshman QB on the road. I havent even booked a play on this game yet, USC wins by no more than 7 but prob 3 and if they straight up lose I wouldn't be surprised at all. And 67% is barely a public favorite.

[Dbldown11]

I didnt mean USC was a public team in this particular match-up. Take your Trojans as double digit favs with a freshman QB on the road. I havent even booked a play on this game yet, USC wins by no more than 7 but prob 3 and if they straight up lose I wouldn't be surprised at all. And 67% is barely a public favorite.

....ok even if you're not talking about this particular game.....USC is that much more of a public team than Notre Dame? Don't think so

[RICHIE801]

....ok even if you're not talking about this particular game.....USC is that much more of a public team than Notre Dame? Don't think so

Your acting like thats my entire basis for not thinking USC covers, this will be a close game bottom line I dont care if nobody had wagered on USC for a decade I still dont think that USC Offense is good enough to cover a 10 pt spread in South Bend.

[twincities77]

Dbl, I bet you 10 SBR points for fun; I'll take ND +10.

[Dbldown11]

Look I only have to go off of what you said....and youre statement didnt make any points other than USC is a public team. I'm not a mind reader

[RICHIE801]

I didnt mean USC was a public team in this particular match-up. Take your Trojans as double digit favs with a freshman QB on the road. I havent even booked a play on this game yet, USC wins by no more than 7 but prob 3 and if they straight up lose I wouldn't be surprised at all. And 67% is barely a public favorite.

....ok even if you're not talking about this particular game.....USC is that much more of a public team than Notre Dame? Don't think so

Your acting like thats my entire basis for not thinking USC covers, this will be a close game bottom line I dont care if nobody had wagered on USC for a decade I still dont think that USC Offense is good enough to cover a 10 pt spread in South Bend.

Look I only have to go off of what you said....and youre statement didnt make any points other than USC is a public team. I'm not a mind reader

???? Did you forget to read my statement about a Freshman QB on the road as a double digit fave? Just cause your trying to cap 90 games this weekend and USC is one a your picks doesnt mean you gotta get your little panties in a bun.

[Dbldown11]

dude I was refferring to your original statement (which you conveniently forgot to quote, do you work for FoxNews?)....the one where you were giving your opinion. And I'm not upset, I was just pointing out that you were wrong in that original statement that's all. If we are here to discuss picks and such then it's only fair that when someone is wrong it should be pointed out so that people arent misled.

Notre Dame is the public team this week, and USC and Notre Dame are both public teams other weeks

[RICHIE801]

dude I was refferring to your original statement (which you conveniently forgot to quote, do you work for FoxNews?)....the one where you were giving your opinion. And I'm not upset, I was just pointing out that you were wrong in that original statement that's all. If we are here to discuss picks and such then it's only fair that when someone is wrong it should be pointed out so that people arent misled.

Notre Dame is the public team this week, and USC and Notre Dame are both public teams other weeks

so you just read my first statement and completely ignored the others?

[Dbldown11]

no....when I originally responded to your FIRST post stating that USC was a bad bet because they were a public team AND NOTHING ELSE

I simply stated that in fact this week Notre Dame was the public team....AND when they' arent playing eachother other they are both public teams.

Then you made one other point that they have a rookie QB. Big deal. But anyways that's not how all this got started

Are you intentionally being a ****ing idiot or is that just something that comes naturally?

[RICHIE801]

And its at 64%, in Vegas Eyes thats less than that cause they keep 10%, so like 54% on ND, WOW WHAT A PUBLIC BET. I am not gonna be surprised when its 64% on your Trojans by game time either.

[RICHIE801]

no....when I originally responded to your FIRST post stating that USC was a bad bet because they were a public team AND NOTHING ELSE

NO. I told you I didnt like the freshman QB and being a double digit road favorite BEFORE you said "oh well im not a mind reader you didnt make any points besides USC is a public team" CAN YOU READ DUMB ****!!!!!

[RICHIE801]

Look I dont give a ****. you wanna wager your 14 measly SBR points?

[Dbldown11]

And its at 64%, in Vegas Eyes thats less than that cause they keep 10%, so like 54% on ND, WOW WHAT A PUBLIC BET. I am not gonna be surprised when its 64% on your Trojans by game time either.

So now you just take statistics......then change them randomly?

64% of the people betting on this game are betting on Notre Dame. yet somehow that equals only 54%? You do work for FoxNews don't you? And if not you should get hired with that kind of math.

Look plain and simple the public team, or the public bet is the one with the higher percentage. 64% is on Notre Dame. not 54% "in vegas eyes". They keep 10% of the wagered amount from juice if that's what your weird math is getting at, that has no effect on how many people are betting a certain team.

Vegas wants as close to 50/50 money on every game as possible, so to say that they consider 64% on Notre Dame 54% is stupid and makes zero sense. we actually don't know how much money is on a certain team. But can assume that more money is Notre Dame since the line is dropping

[RICHIE801]

Your a joke. Matchbook has ND -110, if they cover +10 they are only paying out 54% of that 64% with very few exceptions. and where did it say I take strictly stats? I take many things into consideration. Your just a little college rat. Put up the 14 points, I know how much they mean to you 10$ bettors.

[Dbldown11]

I'm not in college number one....and number two you're the one that feels the need to keep you hundred dollar bill wrapped around a bunch of singles in a plastic baggy and then post it as your avatar to show that you're good at capping

I don't really care to bet my points on this game as there are better games to bet on. I'm on USC but not that strong. Never claimed they were a great pick. Let me try one more time

THE ONLY REASON WE ARE DISCUSSING THIS IS BECAUSE YOU ANSWERED DREEZY'S QUESTION STATING THAT N. DAME IS THE CORRECT PLAY, FOLLOWED BY STATING THAT USC IS A PUBLIC TEAM AND BETTING ON THEM CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR BANKROLL.

I THEM SIMPLY POINTED OUT THAT YOU'RE WRONG. ONE BECAUSE IN THIS GAME NOTRE DAME IS THE PUBLIC TEAM. AND TWO BECAUSE IF YOU REALLY THINK BETTING ON PUBLIC TEAMS IS HAZARDOUS TO YOUR BANKROLL THEN YOUR STATEMENT THAT NOTRE DAME IS THE RIGHT PICK MAKES NO ****ING SENSE BECAUSE THEY ARE AS PUBLIC IF NOT MORE PUBLIC THAN USC...

[RICHIE801]

All you did was make a pathetic attempt at taking my posts out of context. Your a joke. Put up the points if you are so damn confident in your Trojans.

[HoulihansTX]

Damn DblDown, stop wasting time with this 'tard.

Its USC all day. If you watched Ohio State last week you would have seen a team that needs to be head over heels more talented than the opponent in order to score. They got a huge defensive effort last week, but that won't work twice in a row.

[Dbldown11]

All you did was make a pathetic attempt at taking my posts out of context. Your a joke. Put up the points if you are so damn confident in your Trojans.

once again:

I'M NOT SO DAMN CONFIDENT, I JUST THINK THEY ARE A SMARTER PICK THE OHIO ST. FOR **** SAKES. SECONDLY I DIDNT TAKE YOUR POST OUT OF CONTEXT....THAT'S WHAT YOU SAID, AND IT WAS ****ING WRONG. PUT UP POINTS? HOW ABOUT WE EACH PICK OUR 5 BEST PLAYS AND PUT UP THE MONEY IN YOU'RE LITTLE ****ING PLASTIC BAGGY YOU TOOL?

how ****ing dumb can you be

[RICHIE801]

Whats that song by 50? I Smell Pussy...

Boise ST ovr 52 my first.

[Dbldown11]

Whats that song by 50? I Smell Pussy...

Boise ST ovr 52 my first.

so you're just making picks for nothing?

by the way you want to keep calling me names, and making comments about the amount of games I play. I went 11-5 last week POSTED..

Where is your posted record from last week?

[RICHIE801]

And Dbl Dwn, I keep most my money in a Nike shoe box.

[RICHIE801]

so you're just making picks for nothing?

by the way you want to keep calling me names, and making comments about the amount of games I play. I went 11-5 last week POSTED..

Where is your posted record from last week?

IDK look at my posts last week from NCAA, only got one thing wrong(LA Tech). I play big units, not shit loads of games I Admit got diced in the NFL in the morning... And im putting up the 5 plays you requested. Boise Ovr is the first of my 5.

[Dbldown11]

IDK look at my posts last week from NCAA, only got one thing wrong(LA Tech). I play big units, not shit loads of games I Admit got diced in the NFL in the morning... And im putting up the 5 plays you requested. Boise Ovr is the first of my 5.

huh....that's odd. I just saw a post you made in Cougars thread last Saturday about how you lost big on Georgia. FUNNY that your only wrong play was La. Tech then huh?

So now you're a liar............Don't bother posting 5 plays. I wouldnt make a bet with you for a dollar

[Dbldown11]

and you bet big units not shit loads of plays.....I don't care how much money you made (if any). I want to know what your record was. But since it's not posted, and we've discovered that you're a liar it doesn't really matter what you say from here on out

[RICHIE801]

huh....that's odd. I just saw a post you made in Cougars thread last Saturday about how you lost big on Georgia. FUNNY that your only wrong play was La. Tech then huh?

So now you're a liar............Don't bother posting 5 plays. I wouldnt make a bet with you for a dollar

The Georgia loss was against LSU ya dumb ****. I promised myself I'd never bet on the ugly rat Joe Cox again after that and stuck to it.

[RICHIE801]

Its comical how you try to manipulate things.

[RICHIE801]

I was 4-1 **** head. Look it up. And record doesnt matter shit bird, its ALL ABOUT BANK ROLL!

[Dbldown11]

so you were 3-1.....that's +2.....I was 11-5 +6

SO I DID 3X BETTER THAN YOU

[RICHIE801]

so you were 3-1.....that's +2.....I was 11-5 +6

SO I DID 3X BETTER THAN YOU

3-1 where did you get that?

[RICHIE801]

MSU W
La Tech Under W
Nebraska W

Teaser: W I only had about 2 gs on this
Wisconsin
Duke

La Tech L

Look it up shit bird.