[AdamL2424]

ARe you kidding me? Did anybody else see how horrible tulanes whole team was? Does this line seem way off to anyone else?

[bypp]

In my opinion it should be more like -23 or so

[ZBOIZ]

I was thinking more 28 to 31

[bypp]

Yeah, I'd get a little weary layin 30 points but I probably still would. Byu looked good and tulane looked horrible

[hova24e]

Write-up Anyone?

[jimmymo]

I happen to really like Tulane here....waiting for this line to get to 20 before playing...absent Kinne's scrambling, I thought Tulane did a nice job against Tulsa's running game....Hall is a much better passing QB, but won't give them the scrambling issues that Kinne did....BYU in a very tough spot after such a huge win and now talk of running the table for a BCS bid, and possible NC game appearance...which, of course, won't even come close to happening....BYU wins a close one here...my humble opinion.

[jimmyjack]

Jimmymo, I like Tulane here, too. Anderson is a vastly underrated back and Williams and Robottom look to be touch covers for BYU. I completely agree with you that if it were not for Kinne's athleticism and scrambling ability then Tulane could have made that game a lot closer than what it turned out to be.

[jimmyjack]

I may get laughed at for making this statement, but I like Tulsa's receiving corps a lot better with Shelley, Johnson (who is an absolute freak), and Trae Johnson than BYU's. Actually, Tulsa defeated BYU fairly easy last year in Tulsa. Tulsa had an interception that set up a TD, and also had a couple of really good plays on special teams that gave them a short field to work with for a couple other of their scores. I am not a big "situational" handicapper, but I suppose it would be wise to at least give this angle -- BYU coming off of a huge upset of Oklahoma -- ample consideration. If the line creeps up to 20, which I think it ultimately will, I will be on the Green Wave.