Arizona State looks really good today. Looks like the Trojans have their hands full. 21-3 just before halftime.
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
-
10-01-05 04:32 PM #1
USC/Arizona State
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/9/2005
-
10-01-05 04:36 PM #2
This game is dead
USA done for year now
If USC ever played in the SEC they would lose 3 games, no more talk of dnasty
Its all overSBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005
-
10-01-05 04:48 PM #3
jj, i'm not writing off usc in this game yet. there offense is just that explosive.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
-
10-01-05 05:12 PM #4
Game is far from over....
SBR Founder Join Date: 9/4/2005
-
10-01-05 05:20 PM #5
jj, you surprise me sometimes. You're talking like a rookie.
I've seen WAY bigger comebacks than that many, many times.SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005
-
10-01-05 05:24 PM #6
Here come the Trojans...21-17 now.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/9/2005
-
10-01-05 05:27 PM #7
Boys you could be right here
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005
-
10-01-05 08:38 PM #8
if usc played in the sec they wouldn't lose any games the sec is way overrated people on the east coast only see a few usc games and don't get to see how dominant they can be i could be wrong but i dont think so
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/21/2005
-
10-01-05 10:13 PM #9
What a game... I lost a boat load on this game but it was entertaining.
Two weeks in a row, Usc has to crawl out of a hole. The only difference is this week they didn't cover..SBR Founder Join Date: 9/19/2005
Reply With Quote
