| SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks Recommended Books | ||
| 1. Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | SBR Rating A+ | The Greek Review |
| 3. BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| 4. BetJamaica | SBR Rating A+ | BetJamaica Review |
| 5. LegendZ Sports | SBR Rating A+ | LegendZ Review |
| SBR Posters' Poll - March 2009 View Complete Results | ||
| 1. BetJamaica | 251 total points | BetJamaica Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | 217 total points | The Greek Review |
| 3. 5Dimes | 181 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| 4. Matchbook | 159 total points | Matchbook Review |
| 5. Pinnacle Sports | 148 total points | Pinnacle Sports Review |
![]() |
View New Posts |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | ||||
|
![]() *these are the current lines on greek. im liking these values: Travis Lutter +300 Charles McCarthy +275 i also like: Nate Quarry -300 Mac Danzig -480 but i dont really bet on boxing/mma matches so im kinda new to these lines. so is it worth betting on the favors on these matches? im only willing to risk between 100 to 200 bucks on this particular night. so im kinda wondering on how shld i play my 100/200 bucks (having 4 picks (2 dogs, 2 favored)? -300 and -480 i think are just too damn high to bet on and ur only winning a few bucks in return. and if it loses, u basically just got fukked! ![]() 'hoping for some suggestions. ![]() |
||||
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
i would say starnes is the best value for dog
i would be really surprised if mccarthy beat bisping none of the lines jump out as a steal imo |
||||
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
lines at my book:
serra +450 st. pierre -575 lutter +300 franklin -360 starnes +240 quarry -280 mccarthy +300 bisping -360 bocek +370 danzig -450 |
||||
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
I agree, Starnes is the best value. I think Bocek and Lutter are decent dogs.
|
||||
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
Sure Bisping is the favorite, but if your gonna take a dog on this card I'd go with McCarthy. Bisping is good but waaay overrated. No amount of UFC marketing and promotion can cover up his slightly above average skills.
On top of that McCarthy is healthy for the first time in 3 fights. This guy is a slugger. Few people know him right now, however they soon will no matter what happens in this fight. |
||||
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
I think both Lutter and Starnes offer good value but I can't say I like the line you have available on Starnes to much. I got Lutter at +321 and Starnes at +276 when they first came out.
I also placed a small bet on Bocek at +400 more just because I know him and will be cheering hard for him more than anything else. I also like Rich Clementi over Sam Stout which pinnancle has at +130 the last time I checked, Clementi is solid on the ground and should be able to submit Stout. Bisping is overratted but I don't see any value with the line for that fight. I also took GSP to beat Serra within the 5 rounds for -284 at 5dimes. |
||||
|
|
#7 | ||||
|
I'm not keen on Lutter, he hasn't distinguished himself as a top tier fighter, IMO. Franklin is top tier, even if he can't compete with Silva.
Serra at +400 is amazing value.
__________________
Give a hoot — don't pollute! |
||||
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
I want GSP to crush Serra. Not because of the odds, but because Serra is a loud mouth and needs to be destroyed.
I like Danzig to win. Bisping will lose this time because he is not in England for the fix. I would also go with Lutter at +300. |
||||
|
|
#9 | ||||
|
I really like Lutter and Starnes. I think Lutter is tough and if at any point this fight hits the ground Franklin will get subbed.
Starnes is a very solid overall fighter and definately has the ability to win, especially since Quarry has had a lot of health issues in the past. I don't think he is the fighter he once was and think it could be a very good fight. |
||||
|
|
#10 | ||||
|
thanks for the replies guyz!
this is my first time 'capping' ufc fights. i watched a lot of ufc fights but never really bet on them. so im hoping for a beginner's luck! ![]() im gonna play 3 dogs: mccarthy +300 ~ liking this one a lot! lutter +300 starnes +240 round robin by 2's @$30 (3bets 2teamers) = $90 i got swayed on starnes/quarry card - i had quarry initially but i watched old starnes fights on youtube and they look decent. altho i saw his last fight in ufc where he was cut open in the forehead and i wasn't really impressed by him. quarry i think is bigger, meaner and powerful. ...but it seems like a lot of u guys like starnes on this card and i dont really know how quarry is now. i think it was an old footage ive watched and liked. hoping u guys are right and im wrong. so just to make sure, im gonna do a round robin parlay with these 3 dogs. if 2 dogs win, profit of $288 or $360. if 3, a whopping $1116! (given and hoping those lines are still up at my books) since i like mccarthy a lot over bisping, im playing mccarthy for $50 to win $150! i pick GSP and danzig to win in their respective fights but with that high of a line? i think it's not worth it. not even parlaying it with some dogs. *will edit if there are any changes on the lines. |
||||
|
|
#11 | ||||
|
|
||||
|
|
#12 | ||||
|
|
||||
|
|
#13 | ||||
|
Are we all ok out there? Charles is going to get worked, just like GSP.
Serra in 2 by KO |
||||
|
|
#14 | ||||
|
Good luck guys...cash some winnas
![]() |
||||
|
|
#15 | ||||
|
edit: little tweak on playing my 3 underdogs.
3 straight bets of $40. 1 round robin by 2's @20 = $60. total risk = $180 my initially posted possible bets were going for 2 dogs to win or mccarthy to win - i realized that's almost a long shot. if one only come through and it's not maccarthy, i lose my bets outright. now with these 2 bets, if 1 dog only come through, i can get more than half+ of my total ri$k back (a lose of either $20 or $44 only! that's not too bad in my book!) also, if 2 dogs come through, it would be $308 or $380 profit. if 3 dogs come through, it would be $1000+ profit! almost the same as my initially posted possible bets. i'd rather play it these way than losing my money outright with only 1 dog coming through. kinda anal on my part u might say but this is how i play my money - always playing 'defensively' risk-wise. it's what works for me. besides im playing 3 underdogs here, gotta play it 'intelligently', if there ever is such a thing in betting. lol! so 2 dog win pls! (or 3! lol) even with 1 i wont be dat disappointed! goodluck fellas! ![]() Last edited by mundane; 04-18-2008 at 05:32 PM.. |
||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|