[AC1318]

dickey sucks but floyd can't beat seattle


might be better to bet over


floyd gave up 5 in 3

floyd gave up 7 in 4

in his 2 appearences vs seattle

and the 7 run 4 inning was in chicago

and I see some speaking of all in on wsox
he is unproven vs seattle as of now so I think it is a big risk

also last home sweep over seattle was in 2004

[pico]

i want to take wsox also considering seattle really sucks ass. but i don't like to bet RL on a home team.

i'll look at it more. either over or wsox rl

[fifawcs]

Seattle is terrible.

[AC1318]

Im not saying to bet seattle either


but there are many others games out there better than this

[AC1318]

same goes for liriano against oakland 0-3

between him and gavin combine 0-5, but laying the most chalk today

[SlappyWhite]

Originally Posted by AC1318

also last home sweep over seattle was in 2004

meaningless stat, over is probably the way to play the game though.

[max_asdf]

atleast lirano isnt going for the sweeep

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by SlappyWhite

meaningless stat, over is probably the way to play the game though.

this is just an extra piece of info but not a basis on why to bet or not bet either team

didn't I tell you before come with something that matters if you talk

don't cut and paste the info you want

your missing a lot between the bulb and last statement don't you think

[ryanXL977]

floyd lost two times to seattle, what does that have to do with today

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by ryanXL977

floyd lost two times to seattle, what does that have to do with today

ryan when you start picking winners come back to talk Shit

it has to do with the fact he faced twice lost both and lost both bad and early so its smart to lay 225 on guy that never beat the team he is facing

now I know why your on the losing side so much I guess floyd is DUE to win or because seattle is so bad there is VALUE on wsox ( 2 of sbr favorite terms )

I don't give explanations and never did but I do produce on a nightly basis

talk to someone else you are too annoying for me to bother with you

I think over is best thats it

[ryanXL977]

you are an idiot
do you ever watch baseball, seriously? ever? becaue you know nothing at all about it. one game has nothing to do with the next
have you ever played sports?
chisox wont lose today, there is no such thing as due.
you are a moron

[ryanXL977]

tgoo many on the white sox
what a ****ing moron
yes, because there are a lot of people on them, that means they will lose
another moron who thinks bookies control games

[ryanXL977]

good call moron

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by ryanXL977

you are an idiot
do you ever watch baseball, seriously? ever? becaue you know nothing at all about it. one game has nothing to do with the next
have you ever played sports?
chisox wont lose today, there is no such thing as due.
you are a moron

you have a lot to say I wish I was in your presence to knock your teeth out, for a moron I won 30 of my 40 games this weekend I must be a pretty lucky moron while you are still a fag out west go blow your dog

and no to all your questions I hear know and see nothing

[ryanXL977]

come on, internet tough guy
knock my teeth out bc you dont understand american sports
you are a genius, too many on chisox, duh, derr, guh, i am so smart, no home sweep since 2004, that means they cant do it, duh, derr, ahh, dumm

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by ryanXL977

good call moron

I said over so it is a good call

I just dont see value in -225 wsox

so i have less risk but same return can you count and add

[gm2022]

LOL at this thread, Gj as white sox look to put the little league 10 run rule on today

[ryanXL977]

Originally Posted by AC1318

dickey sucks but floyd can't beat seattle


might be better to bet over


floyd gave up 5 in 3

floyd gave up 7 in 4

in his 2 appearences vs seattle

and the 7 run 4 inning was in chicago

and I see some speaking of all in on wsox
he is unproven vs seattle as of now so I think it is a big risk

also last home sweep over seattle was in 2004

meaningless numbers
all of them

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by ryanXL977

come on, internet tough guy
knock my teeth out bc you dont understand american sports
you are a genius, too many on chisox, duh, derr, guh, i am so smart, no home sweep since 2004, that means they cant do it, duh, derr, ahh, dumm

I am convinced your a flamer do you have the rainbow sticker on your trunk

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by AC1318

dickey sucks but floyd can't beat seattle


might be better to bet over


floyd gave up 5 in 3

floyd gave up 7 in 4

in his 2 appearences vs seattle

and the 7 run 4 inning was in chicago

and I see some speaking of all in on wsox
he is unproven vs seattle as of now so I think it is a big risk

also last home sweep over seattle was in 2004

can you read line 2 in this post

OK

[ryanXL977]

good one

good call, chisox havent swept at home since 2004, duh, err, duhh, whaa, duhh


idiot

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by AC1318

Im not saying to bet seattle either


but there are many others games out there better than this

can you read line 1 in this post

OK

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by AC1318

this is just an extra piece of info but not a basis on why to bet or not bet either team

didn't I tell you before come with something that matters if you talk

don't cut and paste the info you want

your missing a lot between the bulb and last statement don't you think

can you read line 1 of this post


OK

[AC1318]

wsox are a better play than the over

real stupid of me

[SlappyWhite]

CWS up 6 in the first, over looks easy, -1.5 looks easy, ML looks easy, CWS day today.

[johnnymapalo]

Originally Posted by AC1318

dickey sucks but floyd can't beat seattle


might be better to bet over


floyd gave up 5 in 3

floyd gave up 7 in 4

in his 2 appearences vs seattle

and the 7 run 4 inning was in chicago

and I see some speaking of all in on wsox
he is unproven vs seattle as of now so I think it is a big risk

also last home sweep over seattle was in 2004

And you laughed because I said I was going all in on the W-Sox...

[ryanXL977]

when two guys who dont know baseball make opposite picks, one of them will be right and one will be wrong

the only person in this forum who goes in during the gamems and bashes peoples picks is jonnymapalo.

[AC1318]

I notice you comment and respond to fragments of what a person says but don't comprehend the whole thing and try to make yourself sound smart

perhaps you should concentrate a little more on trying to win games vs arguing with people like a bitch and your the internet tough guy as you started with your name calling like either a girl a kid or homo would do. I am just letting you know your teeth would be on the floor at your feet simple as that

[ryanXL977]

yes, a girl, a kid, or a homo

you are brain dead
at least finish up high school so you sound 25% less ignorant

good call on seattle

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by johnnymapalo

And you laughed because I said I was going all in on the W-Sox...

I didn't see me post a laughicon next to your pick I said over was a better play and floyd is unproven vs seattle

[AC1318]

Originally Posted by ryanXL977

yes, a girl, a kid, or a homo

you are brain dead
at least finish up high school so you sound 25% less ignorant

good call on seattle

show the post where I said seattle wins

you continue to be ryan

[potsie]

Originally Posted by AC1318

same goes for liriano against oakland 0-3

between him and gavin combine 0-5, but laying the most chalk today

The key here was two motivated teams that can seem to do no wrong vs. two shit teams that can't do anything right and have absolutely nothing to play for.

[AC1318]

doesn't matter to me I won't lay 200 on either team starting a pitcher that never won
I will leave that for everyone else

but I said over in wsox seattle was a better play and that was a winner just the same and at closer to even money

[SlappyWhite]

Originally Posted by AC1318

doesn't matter to me I won't lay 200 on either team starting a pitcher that never won
I will leave that for everyone else

but I said over in wsox seattle was a better play and that was a winner just the same and at closer to even money

True and it was a winner sooner, didn't have to wait 9 to mark it in the books.