[Illusion]

Share your play(s) of the day here.

[Tchocky]

I think Verlander will redeem himself after his awful performance in Game 1 and get the win. I think this series is going back to Detroit.

[Jimmy The Greek]

The way the Tigers are losing makes me believe they'll turn it around. Clean up the mistakes and the wins will come. I'm betting it'll still go seven with the Tigers taking it like '68.

[Bulldog]

I like the Cardinals to win the series but i think the Tigers will take today´s game...
Im pretty sure that Im gonna pass though...

[ivyconniver]

No way, I think last night was too demoralizing for this Tigers team.

Parlaying the Cards and the Over 8 tonight for a 3-1 payout.

[XvMMvX]

Gotta like the cards and the over after verlanders game one performance in DET, Weaver also allows enough runs for it to get over.

getting right at 2.5-1 on my parlay.

[square^2]

det-it aint over yet
over-bats are hot

[Ganchrow]

Interesting that people like the over. The starters are questionable for sure, but Hirschbeck and a 21 MPH wind in from left is a strong under-supporting combo of factors.

It is true Verlander's been getting hit recently because his location has been off, which turns his velocity into a liability. And Weaver is unlikely to have a quality start, so the over may well be the way to go.

Still, we will probably take the under.

[scottyy11]

like the under 8 -115 1unit
cold , wind in,and a long time unders ump
ganchrow u beat me to the punch by 1minute

[goldengoat]

Originally Posted by Ganchrow

Interesting that people like the over. The starters are questionable for sure, but Hirschbeck and a 21 MPH wind in from left is a strong under-supporting combo of factors.

It is true Verlander's been getting hit recently because his location has been off, which turns his velocity into a liability. And Weaver is unlikely to have a quality start, so the over may well be the way to go.

Still, we will probably take the under.

who is we???

are you part of the borg or something?

[Ganchrow]

Originally Posted by goldengoat

who is we???

are you part of the borg or something?

"we" just means like, me, and anyone else who knows what's good for them.

no, "we" means me and my partner. "ganchrow" is 2 people, we study sports gambling and do statistical analysis and make general decisions together.

[darkghost]

Det -119
1 unit

under 7.5 +104
2 units

[nosuzieno]

Originally Posted by goldengoat

who is we???

are you part of the borg or something?

so, even though two people, ganchrow is "one." like Hugh