[pat venditto]

betting the yanks or boston is bad imo is bad because you're betting against a good team and thats not how u win consistenly.

[Cloak & Dagger]

betting teams like SEA and WASH are better in the "long term"

[oddsmaker]

I'm on the Tigers tonight large.

Silvia has lost 8 out of the 10 past starts for the Mariners. Also is sporting a 5.5ish era.

DET are 9-4 in the last 13 meetings in Seattle.

[LT Profits]

Originally Posted by pat venditto

lt it hasnt worked for u pal u've bet 2 million games since april and still have a losing record and are down units.

EXCUSE ME?

Show me ONE SPORT where I have a losing record this year. Go ahead and look, I post updafed records with my plays.

[pat venditto]

alot of pitchers started off rocky this year. look at roy halladay guy was 8-6. Is that what he should be with his potential? No but he started off slow but you know hes capable of shutting down weak offenses just like verlander is quite capable.

[pat venditto]

So it's gonna take u 6,000 mlb plays to be up 1 unit this season?

[ryanXL977]

roy halladay isnt COMPARABLE to verlander bro
not even close
detroit may win tonite, i wont be betting either side
but id take sea if i did

[oddsmaker]

I see nothing wrong with being excited about your picks. Nobody places a bet without true hopes of winning or believing it will hit; however, putting down others picks only to make you sound "better" is simply immature. Regardless, I'm on the Tigers. If it doesn't hit then Seattle backers were right and I was wrong.

[Cloak & Dagger]

Originally Posted by pat venditto

alot of pitchers started off rocky this year. look at roy halladay guy was 8-6. Is that what he should be with his potential? No but he started off slow but you know hes capable of shutting down weak offenses just like verlander is quite capable.

funny...cause the ONLY win TOR got in the series with SEA was when Roy was on the hill

[LT Profits]

Originally Posted by Cloak & Dagger

betting teams like SEA and WASH are better in the "long term"

It is easier to find long term winning situations with those teams than it is to find for teams like the Yankees and Red Sox, yes. The glamor teams are overpriced, and if you bet the Yankees and Red Sox every game, you will end up losing money. And that is a FACT, not an opinion,

[Cloak & Dagger]

Originally Posted by ryanXL977

roy halladay isnt COMPARABLE to verlander bro
not even close
detroit may win tonite, i wont be betting either side
but id take sea if i did

wow you must be smoking some laced weed

just cause Verlander has struggled in the early season you are writing him off?

you are writing off someone who can throw a baseball over 100mph

ok....

those SEA backers might be a little worried that he has pitched better as of late

[pat venditto]

is verlander better than halladay right now? no but he's got the stuff to be a 17-20 game winner just like he put up the past 2 seasons.

[ryanXL977]

verlander is not close to halladay
not in the same league

[LT Profits]

Pat,

Do you follow my plays or even know who I am? If yoiu want tlo have some kind of contest to see which one of us wins more units the rest of the year, I am game.

[Cloak & Dagger]

everyone has a opinion but if you dont have a bet on the game....what you're talking about means nothing

if anything...it makes you look like a bad beat...or a kiss of death

ironically...Ive seen a few of those around here on this forum and anywhere else that involves gambling

the real REAL sad thing about that aspect of gambling is....some....and I do say 'some' people actually get off on seeing other people lose

[pat venditto]

That sounds good to me but i'm not a degen if I bet 13 games a month its alot. Has to be different rules than usual because I dont bet lannan and a little league lineup with ronnie belliard @ cleanup vs a better reds team