I'm no pro but there's obviously a correlation since both plays are involved in the same game so they do depend on each other. You need there a good amount of scoring and you assume Detroit will do more of it.
The disadvantage is a. by playing if you go 1 and 1 you lose everything as opposed to juice if you separate them.
The only advantage is I'm sure the payout is 75% plus.
I still think parlays are more risk than reward overall except when playing two favorites of near -200 or over but that's just from my experience. To reduce risk on two otherwise heavy favorites as going 1-1 in that case kills you. I don't have the math to back it up.
and yes the advantage to this play is the payout is over 4 to 1... which if it is directly correlated, you are getting a 4 to 1 payout on essentially the same one bet
I see a huge advantage to this... Just wondering what you guys think
I been in vegas a while now, and places here for some insane reason accept these parlays
if you pick two correct blow outs
ex tonight : Det RL and over, with Philly RL and over the payout is almost 20 to 1 its insane
put three correct blowouts together, and the payout is 70 to 1
so in other words it is the type of play you dont have to get correct all that often, one winning ticket can get you a decent roll