1. 07-27-11 07:57 PM #1
    gshock1
    gshock1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-09
    Posts: 5,366
    Betpoints: 750

    reds were the squarest play on the board

    Congrats Mets backers!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-27-11 08:02 PM #2
    BigDan
    BigDan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-28-11
    Posts: 5,104
    Betpoints: 0

    personally i think tex and stl were pretty damn square prob more so just because there a lot more public trust with these 2 teams than the reds (for good reason), dont get me wrong im sure reds were pretty "square" but i imagine a lot of ppl jumping off that train at this point.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-27-11 08:04 PM #3
    ebbearsfb1
    ebbearsfb1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-08
    Posts: 18,815
    Betpoints: 1694

    y was bronson minus 152

    he stinks
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-27-11 08:06 PM #4
    BigDan
    BigDan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-28-11
    Posts: 5,104
    Betpoints: 0

    Quote Originally Posted by ebbearsfb1 View Post
    y was bronson minus 152

    he stinks

    yea it doesnt get to much more square than laying that price with gascan Arroyo.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-27-11 08:10 PM #5
    HOT WINGS
    HOT WINGS's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-29-10
    Posts: 8,055
    Betpoints: 3651

    Glad I laid off these fuks. I was close to chasing them this game after they burned me yesterday.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 07-27-11 08:13 PM #6
    Redscot
    Redscot's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-16-11
    Posts: 2,571
    Betpoints: 5802

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDan View Post
    yea it doesnt get to much more square than laying that price with gascan Arroyo.
    Price was ridiculous. Beltran trade moved it perhaps but still? Arroyo! Mets have dealt with controversy all year and knew that Beltran was gonna get moved. Their road record speaks to their steadfastness. If anything today's news was a relief.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 07-27-11 08:19 PM #7
    BigDan
    BigDan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-28-11
    Posts: 5,104
    Betpoints: 0

    Quote Originally Posted by Redscot View Post
    Price was ridiculous. Beltran trade moved it perhaps but still? Arroyo! Mets have dealt with controversy all year and knew that Beltran was gonna get moved. Their road record speaks to their steadfastness. If anything today's news was a relief.

    yea someone on another site asked if Beltran was playing for muts tonight i said no and he instantly said reds for me

    honestly had no interest in this game as i never know what im gonna get from muts and cincy isnt to far behind that. after the 10 unearned runs that fukked the under yesterday i had no reason to get involved any more this series.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 07-27-11 08:20 PM #8
    gshock1
    gshock1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-09
    Posts: 5,366
    Betpoints: 750

    I didn't lay off... I'm an idiot!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 07-27-11 08:24 PM #9
    BigDofBA
    BigDofBA's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-30-09
    Posts: 19,311
    Betpoints: 2011

    Great analysis after the game is half way over..,..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 07-27-11 08:29 PM #10
    Redscot
    Redscot's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-16-11
    Posts: 2,571
    Betpoints: 5802

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDofBA View Post
    Great analysis after the game is half way over..,..
    You can visit LTA's thread to see my Pre-Game analysis bro. I tell it straight, good and the bad.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 07-27-11 08:36 PM #11
    san2c
    san2c's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-09
    Posts: 305
    Betpoints: 234

    a little early to call it, but with the line movement and everything I thought the reds were the only play ( didnt take them but still)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 07-27-11 08:41 PM #12
    gshock1
    gshock1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-09
    Posts: 5,366
    Betpoints: 750

    Quote Originally Posted by san2c View Post
    a little early to call it, but with the line movement and everything I thought the reds were the only play ( didnt take them but still)
    8-2 in the 9th is early?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 07-27-11 08:51 PM #13
    starfire
    starfire's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-24-10
    Posts: 17,045
    Betpoints: 1130

    Halos were the squariest play
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 07-28-11 12:01 AM #14
    BennyFang
    BennyFang's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-27-09
    Posts: 1,412
    Betpoints: 10582

    Well I've played them 3 straight days now.....and I will play them tomorrow. Reds kill lefties @ .285, first in NL. Call me stubborn, just hope they don't run a 17 game losing streak.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 07-28-11 12:15 AM #15
    BigDan
    BigDan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-28-11
    Posts: 5,104
    Betpoints: 0

    Quote Originally Posted by BennyFang View Post
    Well I've played them 3 straight days now.....and I will play them tomorrow. Reds kill lefties @ .285, first in NL. Call me stubborn, just hope they don't run a 17 game losing streak.

    they havnt killed anyone left or right in quite some time. starting to question how they would do in a slow pitch softball game.

    You got a great homer ump going for you 2marro tho and i really like Baily so they shouldnt have to score that many to take this one.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Baseball Betting | Next Thread »