And if so, how would you go about it? Thinking of a Mets/Over parlay to balance it out in case the runs come in droves as they'll likely be the ones doing the damage.
I have a really low bankroll right now so every buck counts, but I'd like to go into the break on a winning note and would hate to miss both parlays. Thoughts?
Jul 10, 2011 03:21 PM (03:30:45 PM) Writer:INETUSR Confirmation #:22453960
4 tms PARLAY 13/300
WON 964. Dodgers (L.A.) PS -1½ +190
WON 980. Angels (L.A. Anaheim) PS -1½ +170
966. Giants (San Francisco) ML -155
965. Mets (New York) / Giants (San Francisco) Un 6½ -115
Jul 10, 2011 03:34 PM (03:36:17 PM) Writer:INETUSR Confirmation #:22454039
5 tms PARLAY 18/310
WON 964. Dodgers (L.A.) ML -113
WON 980. Angels (L.A. Anaheim) ML -140
WON 963. Padres (San Diego) / Dodgers (L.A.) Un 7 -120
966. Giants (San Francisco) ML -155
965. Mets (New York) / Giants (San Francisco) Un 6½ -115
If all you were trying to win was $100 you wouldn't have made four or five team parlays. I too think you should play it out. If I was going to make a hedge, I'd bet on the over. That's the one that will probably hurt you. Giants win this game...Pelfrey sucks on the road and Cain has been pitching well (other than last start).
They were shots in the dark really, didn't expect to win both so I'm happy to play all combos with a little more on the SFG/Over. Still make out with $500+ if the parlays hit. Thanks for the insight!
To Hedge or Not To Hedge?
Reply With Quote