Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
So you're saying that stealing customer's money isn't so bad as long as they got that money by using the services the books advertised, putting other money at risk in the process? That's crap.
The money belongs to the customer, whether it was deposited or won. If SBR is going to treat some thefts as being more serious than others, you're essentially validating out of your own mouths the innuendos that have been spread regarding the slow ratings move in question.
Admitting that you were completely in error might be a better idea.
And for the future: theft is theft.
|
I'm not sure I completely understand what you are saying.
There is only so many ways we can categorize bad books and warn players. We have a Blacklist which both books are members of. We have news history which lists complaints of for the past five years. We also give our assessment of the book with a rating.
As said previously, when it comes to low rated books we need to give players with those books an idea of how risky the situation they are in actually is. If it was only for preemptive measures we could rate all of the offending books at F.
Unfortuantely, there will be players who read about this scam and still try for the bonus or juicy line at Sportsbook.com. It matters that players are much more likely to be paid than at BookTheBet or ESB. Some people will play with a rattlesnake but wont swim with a shark.